期刊文献+

尼拉帕利治疗晚期卵巢癌的快速卫生技术评估 被引量:3

A RAPID Health Technology Assessment of Niraparib for the Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价尼拉帕利用于治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的有效性、安全性和经济性,为临床治疗提供循证医学证据。方法通过计算机检索中国知网、万方、PubMed、Embase、the Cochrane Library等中英文数据库。由2位评价者分别根据纳入与排除标准进行文献筛选、资料提取和分析。结果从检索到的912篇文献中筛选纳入2篇卫生技术评估(HTA)报告、12篇SR/Meta分析、6篇经济学研究。尼拉帕利用于初治晚期卵巢癌患者的维持治疗及铂敏感复发性卵巢癌患者的维持治疗,均可显著延长患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。安全性方面,尼拉帕利治疗可显著增加血液学不良反应的风险,但患者生存质量无明显降低。结论尼拉帕利用于晚期卵巢癌患者的维持治疗可显著延长患者的PFS,具有良好的有效性和可接受的安全性。 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness,safety and economics of niraparib in advanced ovarian cancer patients,and to provide evidence for rational use.METHODS Literature search was performed in Chinese and English database such as CNKI,Wanfang,Pubmed,Embase,and the Cochrane Library.Two reviewers identified literatures,extracted data base on the inclusion and exclusion criteria independently.RESULTS A total of 912 literatures were found through the search,and finally included 2 HTA reports,12 systematic review/Meta-analysis and 6 pharmacoeconomic studies.Compared with placebo,niraparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival(PFS)in maintenance treatment of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.In terms of safety,niraparib treatment can significantly increase the risk of hematological adverse reactions,but the patient's quality of life does not significantly decrease.CONCLUSION Niraparib in the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer can significantly prolong the PFS of patients,with good effectiveness and acceptable safety.
作者 张关敏 赵冰清 张艳华 ZHANG Guan-min;ZHAO Bing-qing;ZHANG Yan-hua(Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research(Ministry of Education/Beijing),Department of Pharmacy,Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute,Beijing 100142,China)
出处 《中国药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第20期1642-1648,共7页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 尼拉帕利 有效性 安全性 经济性 卵巢癌 快速卫生技术评估 niraparib efficacy safety economics ovarian cancer rapid health technology assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1Tricco A C,Antony J,Zarin W,et al.A scoping review of rapid review methods[J].BMC Med,2015,13(1):224.
  • 2Polisena J,Garritty C,Kamel C,et al.Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making:a descriptive analysis of processes and methods[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):26.
  • 3Ganann R,Ciliska D,Thomas H.Expediting systematic reviews:methods and implications of rapid reviews[J].Implement Sci,2010(5):56.
  • 4Khangura S,Konnyu K,Cushman R,et al.Evidence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review approach[J].Syst Rev,2012(1):10.
  • 5Harker J,Kleijnen J.What is a rapid review?A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments[J].Int J Evid Based Healthc,2012,10(4):397-410.
  • 6Featherstone R M,Dryden D M,Foisy M,et al.Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews:an analysis of results,conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):50.
  • 7Hailey D.Toward transparency in health technology assessment:a checklist for HTA reports[J].Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2003,19(1):1-7.
  • 8Brouwers M,Kho M E,Browman G P,et al.AGREE II:Advancing guideline development,reporting and evaluation in healthcare[J].J Clin Epidemol,2010,63(12):1308-1311.
  • 9Higgins J P T,Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][J/OL].(2011-03-10)[2015-07-21].http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 10Shea B J,Grimshaw J M,Wells G A,et al.Development of AMSTAR:A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews[J].BMC Med Res Methodol,2007,7(10):1-10.e7-8.

共引文献242

同被引文献109

引证文献3

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部