期刊文献+

“相对折扣”还是“绝对折扣”?消费者在不同购买类型情境下对折扣呈现方式的偏好 被引量:1

"Relative Discount"or "Absolute Discount"?Consumers'Preference for Discount Presentation in Different Purchase Types
下载PDF
导出
摘要 消费者在促销情境中经常会遇到绝对折扣(如原价299元,立减69元)与相对折扣(如原价299元,现20%折扣)两种折扣方式,但现有研究关于两种折扣孰优孰劣并未得出一致性结论,这也导致商家在进行折扣促销表征方式选择上并未有明确的策略,尤其是当消费者处于不同的购买类型的消费情境时。有鉴于此,基于可评估性理论,通过4个实验探究消费类型与折扣方式的匹配效应。首先,通过探索性实验1A初步验证了消费者在物质购买情境中选择绝对折扣促销广告的比例更多,而在体验购买情境中选择相对折扣促销广告的比例更多,为购买类型与折扣方式的匹配效应提供初步证据。其次,实验1B通过实验室实验并更改了操控与测量方式再次验证了实验1A的结论,即消费者对于物质购买情境中的绝对折扣目标产品有更高的购买意愿;相反,在体验购买情境中,消费者对相对折扣具有更高的购买意愿,进一步拓展了研究外部效度。再次,通过实验室2验证了可评估性程度是上述匹配效应的中介机制。最后,通过实验3实验室实验验证了该效应存在的边界条件——个体的认知负载状态。具体而言,其购买类型与折扣方式的匹配效应只存在于消费者低认知负载状态时,当消费者处于高认知负载状态时,该效应消失。本文拓展了购买类型、计算比较方式以及评估模式的相关理论,也为商家制定折扣促销策略提供了实践指导。 In a promotion situation,consumers often encounter two kinds of discounts:absolute discount.(For instance,the original price is RMB 299 Yuan,and the immediate reduction is RMB 69 Yuan.)and relative discount.(For instance,the original price is RMB 299 Yuan,now it is sold at a discount of 20%.).However,the existing research on the relative merits of the two kinds of discounts has not.reached a consistent conclusion,leading to the lack of clear strategies for a businessman to choose the representation method of discount,promotion,especially when consumers are in different,types of consumption situations.In view of this,this paper explores the matching effect,of consumption type and discount,mode through four experiments based on the evaluability theory.First.,the exploratory experiment 1A preliminarily verifies that more consumers choose absolute discount promotion advertisements in the material purchase situation whereas more consumers choose relative discount promotion advertisements in the experiential purchase situation,providing preliminary evidence for the matching effect between the purchase type and discount mode.Next.,experiment 1B verifies the conclusion of experiment 1A again by laboratory experiments and changing the control and measurement methods,i.e.,consumers have a higher purchase intention for the absolute discount target product in the material purchase situation.On the contrary,in the experiential buying situation,consumers have a higher purchase intention for relative discount.,which further expands the external validity of the study.After that,laboratory 2 verifies that the degree of assessability is the mediating mechanism of the above matching effect.Finally,experiment 3 verifies the cognitive load state of the individual,i.e.,the boundary condition for the existence of the effect.Specifically,the matching effect of the purchase type and discount mode only exists when consumers are in the state of low cognitive load,and the effect disappears when consumers are in the state of high cognitive load.This paper expands the relevant theories of purchase types,calculation comparison method,and evaluation mode,providing practical guidance for merchants to formulate discount promotion strategies.
作者 段珅 王喆 李园园 DUAN Shen;WANG Zhe;LI Yuanyuan(School of Business,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China;School of Economics and Management.,Sichuan Tourism University,Chengdu 610100,China;School of Business Administration,Shanxi University of Finance and Economics,Taiyuan 030006,China)
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期1025-1040,共16页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 中国人民大学2020年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划 国家社会科学基金重点项目(19AG L016)。
关键词 折扣方式 购买类型 可评估性程度 认知负载 discount presentation mode purchase type degree of assessability cognitive load
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1韩睿,田志龙.促销类型对消费者感知及行为意向影响的研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(2):85-91. 被引量:91
  • 2张黎.价格促销对商店整体价格形象的影响:理论与实证研究回顾[J].商业经济与管理,2006(5):25-31. 被引量:6
  • 3Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny, 1986, “The Moderatormediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), pp.1173-1182.
  • 4Della Bitta, A.J. and K.B. Monroe, 1980, "A Multivariate Analysis of the Perception of Value from Retail Price Advertisements", Advances in Consumer Research, 8, pp.161-165.
  • 5Dodds, W.B., K.B. Monroe and D. Grewal, 1991, "The Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations",Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3),pp.307-319.
  • 6Estelami, H.I 2003, "The Effect of Price Presentation Taeties on Consumer Evaluation Effort of Multi-dimensional Priees", Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(2), pp.1- 16.
  • 7Grewal, D., K.B. Monroe and R. Krishnan, 1998, "The Effects of Price-comparlson Advertising on Buyers' Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value and Behavioral Intentions", Journal of Marketing, 62(2), pp. 46-59.
  • 8Gupta, S. and L. G. Cooper, 1992, "The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds",Journal of Consumer Research, 19,pp.401-411.
  • 9Kim, H. M. and T. Kramer, 2006, "The Moderating Effects of Need for Cognition and Cognitive Effort on Responses to Multi-dimensional Prices", Marketing Letters, 17(3), pp.193- 203.
  • 10Kim, H. M. and T. Kramer, 2006, “‘Pay 80% ' Versus ‘Get 20% off': The Effect of Novel discount Presentation on Consumers' Deal Perceptions”, Marketing Letters, 17 (4), pp. 311-321.

共引文献80

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部