期刊文献+

减税降费背景下我国避免对外投资双重征税政策研究 被引量:2

Double Taxation Relief:Analysis and Implication for China
原文传递
导出
摘要 对外开放是基本国策,减税降费是近些年我国应对经济下行压力所采取的重要举措。在此背景下,如何更好解决对外投资中所面临的重复征税问题尤为重要。跨国投资征税实践中常用的两种避免双重征税的方法包括抵免法与免税法。研究结果表明:相较于抵免法,免税法能够更加有效地促进对外投资和降低税收的征管成本,并且不会以牺牲过多的税收收入作为代价。结合中国的对外投资情况计算得出,如果我国从抵免法转为免税法,对外直接投资所取得的股息收入的税收负担将从25.4%降低到14%;对63个"一带一路"沿线国家而言,这个数字将从26.9%下降到22.7%。 Opening-up is the basic state policy,and slashing tax and fee is the important measure China has adopted to tackle the pressure caused by economic downturn.In this context,how to relieve double taxation for foreign investment is worth researching.This study analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the two mostly commonly used methods for double taxation relief and provides relevant economic studies.We find that,compared to the credit method,the exemption method offers stronger incentives to outward investment and it has lower administrative costs.It may not sacrifice much tax revenue as the credit method.Further,we calculate that the FDI weighted tax liability on the dividend income decreases from 25.4 percent to 14 percent as China switches from the credit method to the exemption method based on the statutory tax rates of the ten largest jurisdictions having Chinese outward investment.We conduct a similar study for the 63 B&R countries as well and find that this number drops from 26.9 percent to 22.7 percent.
作者 张静 张鹤 王越 ZHANG Jing;ZHANG He;WANG Yue
出处 《吉林大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第6期127-137,233,共12页 Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(14XNQ0032)。
关键词 对外投资 双重征税 税收政策 抵免法 免税法 “一带一路” outward investment double taxation tax policy the credit method the exemption method the"Belt and Road"
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1谢丹阳、姜波,2012:《中美对外直接投资表现对比》,《金融时报》1月20日.
  • 2Aleksynska,M.,and O. Havrylchyk, 2012, “ FDI from the South: The Role of Institutional Distance and Natural Resources”,European Journal of Political Economy, 29,38-53.
  • 3Amit, R.,and P. J. Schoemaker,1993 , “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”,Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
  • 4Andersson, T. , and R. Swensson, 1996 , “Entry Modes for Direct Investment Determined by the Composition of Firm-specific Skills", Scandinavian Journal of Economics,96(4) , 551-560.
  • 5Boddewyn, J. J.,and T. L. Brewer, 1994,“ International-business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions”,Academy of Management Review , 19(1), 119-143.
  • 6Buckley, P. J.,J. Clegg, A. R. Cross, X. Liu, H. Voss, and P. Zheng, 2007, “The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment”,Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4),499-518.
  • 7Busse, M.,and C. Hefeker, 2007,“Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment”,European Journal of Political Economy,23(2) , 397-415.
  • 8Caves, R. E.,1996 , Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Cheung, Yin-Wong, and Xingwang Qian, 2009,“Empirics of China’s Outward Direct Investment”,Pacific Economic Review, 14(3), 321-341.
  • 10China Daily, 2013,Nation Vaults to World's 3rd-largest Investor, http://usa. chinadaily. com. cn/business/2013 - 09/10/content_ 16955998.htm.

共引文献437

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部