期刊文献+

差分整合移动平均自回归模型与深度学习模型在吸脂操作数据预测分析中的应用比较 被引量:1

Comparison of autoregressive integrated moving average model and deep learning model in prediction and analysis of liposuction operation data
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较差分整合移动平均自回归模型(ARIMA)和深度学习模型在吸脂操作数据预测分析方面的应用价值。方法选取2019年1至9月中国医学科学院整形外科医院符合入选标准的行吸脂手术患者,使用基于光学追踪系统和力传感技术的吸脂操作记录系统,采集高年资整形外科医生吸脂手术初始250~400 s的操作数据,包括运动学和力学数据。经预处理后将采集数据分成一个吸脂往复循环为一组的数据。分别使用ARIMA模型和深度学习模型处理分析采集到的数据,建立吸脂操作预测模型。用Matlab 2017软件产生随机数随机抽取30对共计60组吸脂循环数据,计算每对数据的动态时间规整(DTW)值作为检验标准,然后分别计算基于ARIMA模型与深度学习模型的各30组预测数据与实际数据之间的DTW值,与检验标准对比,对2种模型的预测结果进行验证。应用Matlab 2017软件进行统计分析,2组比较用独立样本t检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果共入组18例患者,均为女性,年龄23~49岁,平均36.6岁。吸脂部位分别为腹部、大腿、腰部。共获得16800组吸脂循环数据。模型检验标准DTW值为0.048±0.028。ARIMA模型预测数据与实际数据之间的DTW值为0.660±0.577,与检验标准比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。深度学习模型得出的DTW值为0.052±0.030,与检验标准比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比ARIMA模型,深度学习模型可以更准确地预测吸脂操作数据,能更好地适应不同情况的数据,并且具有更好的实时性。 Objective This study aims to compare the applicability value of autoregressive integrated moving average model(ARIMA)and deep learning model inprediction and analysis of liposuction operation data.Methods The patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent liposuction surgery in the Plastic Surgery Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2019 to September 2019 were enrolled in this study.For each patient,250-400 s operation data including kinematics and mechanical data were collected by a senior plastic surgeon,using the liposuction operation recording system which consists of optical tracking and force sensing equipment.After pretreatment,the collected data were divided into one liposuction reciprocating cycle as one set of data.ARIMA model and deep learning model were used to analyze the collected data for establishing prediction models of liposuction operation.Using Matlab 2017,30 couples of liposuction data set were extracted by simple random sampling,and the dynamic time warping(DTW)value of each couple of data sets was calculated as test standard.Then,the DTW values between 30 sets of predicted data and actual data based on the ARIMA model and the deep learning model were calculated respectively and compared with the test standard to verify the prediction results of the two models.Matlab 2017 was used for statistical analysis.Independent sample t-test was used to compare the two groups,and P<0.05 indicated statistically significant difference.Results Eighteen patients were enrolled.All patients were females at 23-49 years old,with the mean age of 36.6 years old.Liposuction was performed in the abdomen,thighs,and waist.A total of 16800 sets of liposuction cycle data were obtained.The mean DTW value of test standard was 0.048±0.028.The mean DTW value between the ARIMA model predicted data and the actual data was 0.660±0.577,which was statistically significant compared with the test standard(P<0.05).The mean DTW value between the deep learning model predicted data and the actual data was 0.052±0.030,which was not significantly different compared to the test standard(P>0.05).Conclusions Compared with ARIMA model,deep learning model can predict liposuction operation data more accurately,and has better adaptability and real-time performance.
作者 孙志彬 周钢 陈思洁 王禹能 王豫 李发成 蒋海越 Sun Zhibin;Zhou Gang;Chen Sijie;Wang Yuneng;Wang Yu;Li Facheng;Jiang Haiyue(School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China;Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 100083,China;Center of Body Contouring and Liposuction Center,Plastic Surgery Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100144,China;Center of Auricular Reconstruction,Plastic Surgery Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100144,China)
出处 《中华整形外科杂志》 CSCD 2021年第10期1102-1108,共7页 Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项(2018-1-4041)。
关键词 脂肪切除术 预测 人工智能 机器学习 脂肪抽吸术 深度学习 Lipectomy Forecasting Artificial intelligence Machine learning Liposuction Deep learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1李丹,卡索.股骨干骨折并发脂肪栓塞综合征五例临床分析[J].华北国防医药,2005,17(1):39-39. 被引量:5
  • 2王新同,王强,朱伟,王大民.多发骨折并发脂肪栓塞综合征12例[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2007,10(11):1291-1291. 被引量:2
  • 3Dellas C, Puls M, Lankeit M, et al. Elevated heart-type fat- ty acid-binding protein levels on admission predict an ad- verse outcome in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010,55(19) :2150-2157.
  • 4Goldhaber S Z. Fine-tuning risk stratification for acute pul- monary embolism with cardiac biomarkers [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2010,55 (19) :2158-2159.
  • 5Bergqvist D. Update on in hospital venous thromboembolism prophylaxis[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007,33(3):343-350.
  • 6Lovering A T, Elliott J E, Beasley K M, et al. Pulmonary pathways and mechanisms regulating transpulmonary shunting into the general circulation : an update [ J ]. Injury, 2010,41 (Suppl 2) :S16-$23.
  • 7Bhalla S, Lopez-Costa I. MDCT of acute thrombotic and nonthrombotic pulmonary emboli [ J ]. Eur J Radiol, 2007,64 (1) :54-64.
  • 8Rajan G R. Intractable intraoperative hypoxemia secondary to pulmonary embolism in the presence of undiagnosed patent foramen ovale [ J ]. J Clin Anesth, 21X'/, 19 ( 5 ) : 374-377.
  • 9Poisner A M, Adler F, Uhal B, et al. Persistent and pro- gressive pulmonary fibrotic changes in a model of fat embol- ism[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012,72(4) :992-998.
  • 10Inoue H, Hanagama M, Kamiya M, et al. Gene expression on liver toxicity induced by administration of haloperidol in rats with severe fatty liver[J]. Leg Med (Tokyo), 2008,10 (1) :26-30.

共引文献72

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部