期刊文献+

腹膜透析患者起始透析剂量对生存率的影响 被引量:3

Effect of initial dialysis dose on survival in peritoneal dialysis patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同透析时机开始腹膜透析(peritoneal dialysis,PD)的患者,每日8 L及6 L剂量起始对生存率的影响。方法回顾性研究2012年1月至2019年12月单中心规律随访,透析超过3个月的患者,根据开始透析时不同的估算肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)分为3组,A组eGFR<4 mL·(min·1.73 m^(2))^(-1),B组eGFR≥4,<6 mL·(min·1.73 m^(2))^(-1),C组eGFR≥6 mL·(min·1.73 m^(2))^(-1),调查原发病、透析初始月白蛋白、转运功能及最终转归,比较不同组PD患者在使用6 L和8 L起始透析剂量的生存率差异。结果共研究504例患者,A组52例,B组156例,C组296例,三组患者5年生存率分别为64.0%、79.0%、71.6%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.306),Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析,根据eGFR分层后,A组和B组使用每日6 L起始的PD患者的中位生存时间低于每日8 L起始的患者[(48.78±7.18)个月比(95.46±7.18)个月,χ^(2)=5.439,P=0.020,(79.78±5.87)个月比(99.66±4.09)个月,χ^(2)=4.509,P=0.034],而C组患者,6 L及8 L起始比较对生存没有明显差异(χ^(2)=0.388,P=0.533)。每日8 L起始的患者,不同透析时机患者的生存时间差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=0.280 P=0.870)。多因素Cox生存分析示,糖尿病、透析前低蛋白血症、老年是导致患者死亡的独立危险因素,起始为每日8 L透析剂量是生存的保护性因素(OR=0.577,95%CI 0.336~0.990,P=0.037),腹膜转运功能和透析前eGFR不影响PD患者的生存率。结论(1)对于透析开始时残余肾功能较差的患者,起始透析剂量不足是影响PD患者生存率的独立危险因素。(2)对于开始透析时eGFR≥6 mL·(min·1.73 m^(2))^(-1)的患者,每日8 L起始的透析剂量并不能比6 L带来更大的生存获益。 Objective To compare the effect of initial daily dialysis dose of 8 L versus 6 L on the survival rate in peritoneal dialysis(PD)patients with different baseline residual renal function.Methods From January 2012 to December 2019,504 PD patients treated over 3 months were enrolled retrospectively.According to the baseline value of estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),they were divided into three groups.That was eGFR<4 mL·(min·1.73m^(2))^(-1)in group A(n=52),4-6 mL·(min·1.73m^(2))^(-1)in group B(n=156)and≥6 mL·(min·1.73m^(2))^(-1)in group C(n=296).Primary etiologies,laboratory parameters at Month 1 post-PD,peritoneal transport functions and clinical outcomes were recorded.The survival rate of different initial daily dialysis doses(6 L versus 8 L)was compared among 3 groups.Results The 5-year survival rates of three groups were 64.0%,79.0%and 71.6%respectively.And there was no statistical difference(P=0.306).Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that,except for group C,median survival time of PD patients with 6 L initial dialysis dose was lower than that with 8 L in group A/B(48.78±7.18 versus 95.46±7.18 months,χ^(2)=5.439 P=0.020,79.78±5.87 versus 99.66±4.09 months,χ^(2)=4.509,P=0.034).No significant difference existed in survival time of patients with 8 L/d with different timing of dialysis(χ^(2)=0.280,P=0.870).Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus,baseline hypoalbuminemia and advanced age were independent risk factors for patient mortality.The initial daily dialysis dose of 8 L was a protective factor(OR=0.577,95%CI 0.336-0.990,P=0.037).Peritoneal transport function and baseline eGFR had no effect upon the prognosis of PD patients.Conclusions For PD patients with poor residual renal function at the initiation of PD,low dialysis dose independently predicts patient mortality.And 8L initial daily dialysis dose yields no greater survival benefits than 6 L/d in those with eGFR≥6 mL·(min·1.73m^(2))^(-1) at the initiation of dialysis.
作者 王晓培 马莹 吕晶 路万虹 梁嫦娜 钱宝 靳引红 Wang Xiao-pei;Ma Ying;Lyu Jing;Lu Wang-hong;Liang Chang-na;Qian Bao;Jin Yin-Hong(Department of Nephrology,First Affiliated Hospital,Xi′an Jiaotong University,Xi′an 710061,China)
出处 《临床肾脏病杂志》 2021年第11期904-910,共7页 Journal Of Clinical Nephrology
基金 西安交通大学第一附属医院临床科研课题面上项目(XJTU1AF-CRF-2019-017)。
关键词 腹膜透析 透析起始剂量 生存率 Peritoneal dialysis Initial dialysis dose Survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献45

  • 1蒋红樱,程李涛,汪涛.腹膜透析患者高血压的产生与容量超负荷的关系[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2005,21(6):367-369. 被引量:45
  • 2鲁新红,孙玲华,汪涛.应用持续质量改进减少腹膜透析病人低钾血症的发生[J].护理研究(中旬版),2006,20(12):3224-3226. 被引量:6
  • 3Germain MJ, Cohen LM, Davison SN. Withholding and Withdrawalfrom Dialysis: What we know about how our patients die [ J]. Source Seminars in-Dialysis, 2007, 20 (3) : 195 -199.
  • 4Korevaar JC, Jansen MAM, Dekker FW. When to initiate dialysis: effect of proposed US guidelines on survival [J]. Lancet, 2001, 358: 1046 - 1050.
  • 5Blake PG, Stojimirovic B. Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death [J]. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 2001, 10 : 749 - 754.
  • 6Lai KN, Lo WK. Optimal peritoneal dialysis for patients from Hong Kong [J]. Perrit Dial Int, 1999, 19 (suppl 3) : 26-31.
  • 7Burkart JM. Asequacy of peritoneal dialysis [ M ] //R. Gokal, R. Khanna, R. Th. , K. D Nolph (eds). Textbook of peritoneal dialysis, 2nd edition. London: Kluacer Academic Publisher, 2000:465 - 497.
  • 8Wang AY - M, Lai K N. The importance Of residual renal function in dialysis patients [J]. Kidney Int, 2006, 69: 1726-1732.
  • 9Wang AY, Sea Mandy MM, Ricky IP, et al. Independent effects of residual renal function and dialysis adequancy on acutal dietary protein, calorie, and other - nutrition intake in patients on continous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [J]. Am Nephrol, 2001, 12: 2450-2457.
  • 10Yang WC, Hwang SJ, Chiang SS, et al. The impact of diabetes on economic costs in dialysis patients: experiences in Taiwan [J]. Diabetes Reseach and Clinial Practice, 2001, 54 (suppl) : 47 -54.

共引文献34

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部