期刊文献+

基于分解的高维多目标改进进化算法 被引量:2

Improved high-dimensional many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对基于参考向量的高维多目标进化算法中随机选择父代个体会降低算法的收敛速度,以及部分参考向量分配个体的缺失会减弱种群多样性的问题,提出了一种基于分解的高维多目标改进优化算法(IMaOEA/D)。首先,在分解策略框架下,当一个参考向量至少分配了2个个体时,对该参考向量分配的个体根据其到理想点的距离选择父代个体来繁殖子代,从而提高搜索速度。然后,针对未能分配到至少2个个体的参考向量,则从所有个体中选择沿该参考向量和理想点距离最小的点,使得该参考向量至少有2个个体与其相关。同时,确保环境选择后每个参考向量有一个个体与其相关,从而保证种群的多样性。在10个和15个目标的MaF测试问题集上将所提算法与其他4个基于分解的高维多目标优化算法进行了测试对比,实验结果表明所提算法对于高维多目标优化问题具有较好的寻优能力,且该算法在30个测试问题中的14个测试问题上得到的优化结果均优于其他4个对比算法,特别是对于退化问题具有一定的寻优优势。 In the reference vector based high-dimensional many-objective evolutionary algorithms,the random selection of parent individuals will slow down the speed of convergence,and the lack of individuals assigned to some reference vectors will weaken the diversity of population.In order to solve these problems,an Improved high-dimensional Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition(IMaOEA/D)was proposed.Firstly,when a reference vector was assigned at least two individuals in the framework of decomposition strategy,the parent individuals were selected for reproduction of offspring according to the distance from the individual assigned to the reference vector to the ideal point,so as to increase the search speed.Then,for the reference vector that was not assigned at least two individuals,the point with the smallest distance from the ideal point along the reference vector was selected from all the individuals,so that at least two individuals and the reference vector were associated.Meanwhile,by guaranteeing one individual was related to each reference vector after environmental selection,the diversity of population was ensured.The proposed method was tested and compared with other four high-dimensional many-objective optimization algorithms based on decomposition on the MaF test problem sets with 10 and 15 objectives.Experimental results show that,the proposed algorithm has good optimization ability for high-dimensional many-objective optimization problems:the optimization results of the proposed algorithm on 14 test problems of the 30 test problems are better than those of the other four comparison algorithms.Especially,the proposed algorithm has certain advantage on the degradation problem optimization.
作者 乔钢柱 王瑞 孙超利 QIAO Gangzhu;WANG Rui;SUN Chaoli(College of Computer Science and Technology,Taiyuan University of Science and Technology,Taiyuan Shanxi 030024,China;School of Data Science and Technology,North University of China,Taiyuan Shanxi 030051,China)
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第11期3097-3103,共7页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(61876123) 山西省自然科学基金资助项目(201901D111264,201901D111262)。
关键词 高维多目标优化 参考向量 收敛性 多样性 环境选择 high-dimensional many-objective optimization reference vector convergence diversity environmental selection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal A, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.
  • 2Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L. SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems. Athens, Greece: CIMNE, 2001. 95-100.
  • 3Deb K, Saxena D K. Searching for Pareto-optimal solutions through dimensionality reduction for certain largedimensional multi-objective optimization problems. In: Pro- ceedings of the 2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Vancouver, Canada: IEEE, 2006. 3353-3360.
  • 4Jaimes A L, Coello C A C, Chakraborty D. Objective reduction using a feature selection technique. In: Proceedings of the LOth Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. New York, USA: ACM, 2008. 673-680.
  • 5Adra SF, Fleming P J. Diversity management in evolutionary many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2011, 15(2): 183-195.
  • 6Li M Q, Yang S X, Liu X H. Shift-based density estimation for Pareto-based algorithms in many-objective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(3): 348-365.
  • 7Sato H, Aguirre H E, Tanaka K. Pareto partial dominance MOEA and hybrid archiving strategy included CDAS in many-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 2010. 1-8.
  • 8Jaimes A L, Coello C A C, Aguirre H, Tanaka K. Objective space partitioning using conflict information for solving many-objective problems. Information Sciences, 2014, 268: 305-327.
  • 9Deb K, Mohan M, Mishra S. Evaluating the s-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions. Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 13(4): 501-525.
  • 10Kukkonen S, Lampinen J. Ranking-dominance and manyobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Singapore: IEEE, 2007. 3983-3990.

共引文献57

同被引文献22

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部