期刊文献+

基于SDOF体系和高层结构的地震动强度指标研究 被引量:1

Ground motion intensity measures based on SDOF system and high-rise structures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 合理的地震动强度指标是预测和评价结构抗震响应的重要基础。选取24个周期点的单自由度体系和一个高层框架核心筒长周期结构,基于不同震源机制的100条地震动记录时程分析结果,研究16种地震动强度指标与结构地震响应的相关性,并提出考虑高阶振型影响的改进反应谱相关型地震动强度指标。研究表明:(1)不同地震动强度指标与结构地震响应的相关性差别较大,随着单自由度体系自振周期的增大,地震动强度指标与单自由度体系地震响应的相关性大致呈减小的趋势;(2)对于高层长周期结构,综合对比分析各地震动强度指标分别与顶点最大位移、最大基底剪力、最大层间位移的相关性,从工程实用角度出发,推荐地面运动峰值速度为最佳地震动强度指标;(3)由于高层长周期结构受高阶振型影响显著,采用含有高阶振型因素的反应谱强度指标可提高与结构地震响应的相关性。 Reasonable ground motion intensity measures are important basis for predicting and evaluating the seismic response of structures.One long-period high-rise frame core tube structure and a single degree of freedom(SDOF)system with 24 periodic points were selected.Based on the time-history analysis results of 100 ground motion records with different focal mechanisms,the correlations between 16 ground motion intensity measures and the structural seismic response were studied,and improved spectral correlation ground motion intensity measures considering the influence of high modes were proposed.The results showed that:(1)The correlations between different ground motion intensity measures and the structural seismic response are quite different.With the increase in natural period of SDOF system,the correlation between intensity measures and the seismic response tend to decrease.(2)According to the analysis of correlations between each intensity measure and seismic responses of the high-rise long-period structure(maximum vertex displacement,maximum base shear,and maximum story drift),the peak ground velocity is recommended as the best intensity measure for high-rise long-period structures.(3)As high-rise long-period structures are significantly affected by high modes,the response spectrum measure with high modes can be used to improve the correlation.
作者 侯红梅 刘文锋 张怀超 HOU Hongmei;LIU Wenfeng;ZHANG Huaichao(School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;Green Building Digital Construction Laboratory of Technology Engineering in Shandong Province, Qingdao 266033, Shandong, China;Shandong Lukan Engineering Testing and Appraisal Co. Ltd., Ji'nan 250118, Shandong, China)
出处 《地震工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期1436-1443,共8页 China Earthquake Engineering Journal
关键词 时程分析 地震动强度指标 结构响应 相关性 高阶振型 time-history analysis ground motion intensity measure structural response correlation high mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

  • 1卢啸,陆新征,叶列平.超高层建筑地震动强度指标探讨[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(S1):292-296. 被引量:16
  • 2刘彦辉,谭平,周福霖,杜永峰,闫维明.高层框架-剪力墙隔震结构地震响应研究[J].工程力学,2015,32(3):134-139. 被引量:22
  • 3郝敏,谢礼立,徐龙军.关于地震烈度物理标准研究的若干思考[J].地震学报,2005,27(2):230-234. 被引量:37
  • 4杨迪雄,赵岩,李刚.近断层地震动运动特征对长周期结构地震响应的影响分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2007,27(2):133-140. 被引量:49
  • 5中华人民共和国国家标准.GB50011-2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
  • 6Nau J M, Hall W J. Scaling methods for earthquake response spectra [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(7): 1533- 1548.
  • 7Riddell R. On ground motion intensity indices [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(1): 147-173.
  • 8Yakut A, Yllmaz H. Correlation of deformation demands with ground motion intensity [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 134(12): 1818- 1828.
  • 9Housner G W, Jennings P C. The capacity of extreme earthquake motions to damage structures [C]//Newmark N M, Hall W J. Structural and Geotechnical Mechanics: A Volume Honoring Nathan M. Newmark, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1977: 102- 116.
  • 10Fajfar P, Vidic T, Fischinger M. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1990, 9(5): 236-242.

共引文献85

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部