期刊文献+

基于ANP的工程教育认证“土力学”课程达成度计算 被引量:5

Calculation of Achievement Degree of Soil Mechanics Course for Engineering Education Certification Based on ANP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 工程教育认证核心指标是毕业达成度的评价,课程达成度是毕业达成度评价基础,因此课程达成度计算方法的研究具有重要意义.课程目标支撑毕业要求指标点,而课程达成度计算关键点在于课程目标权重的确定,由于各课程目标存在关联性,因此适用于具有反馈功能的网络分析法ANP(Analytic Network Process)计算课程目标权重.该文以工程认证的三个理念,即“学生为中心”“成果产出为导向”“持续改进为目标”为框架,基于ANP建立了以课程学习成果为技术指标的课程达成度计算方法.以“土力学”课程为例,采用该方法计算课程达成度.结果表明:该方法能够体现工程认证的三个理念,提出的计算方法可行,为毕业达成度评价奠定了基础. The geological engineering specialty of Jilin Jianzhu University has passed the professional certification of Engineering Education in 2019.Graduation achievement degree is the core of engineering certification,and curriculum achievement degree is the basis of graduation achievement degree evaluation,so the calculation method of curriculum achievement degree has important research significance.The course objectives support the graduation requirement index points,and the curriculum objectives are related,so it is suitable for ANP(Analytical Network Process)with feedback function to calculate the weight of course objectives.Based on the framework of three concepts of engineering certification,namely"student as the core","achievement output oriented"and"continuous improvement as the goal",a calculation method of curriculum achievement degree based on ANP is established.The course achievement degree of soil mechanics is calculated.The results show that the method can reflect the three concepts of engineering certification,and the proposed calculation method is feasible,which lays a foundation for graduation achievement degree evaluation.
作者 方宏伟 FANG Hong-wei(School of Geomatics and Prospecing Engineering,Jilin Jianzhu University,Changchun 130118,China)
出处 《通化师范学院学报》 2021年第12期28-35,共8页 Journal of Tonghua Normal University
关键词 课程达成度 课程目标 网络分析法ANP 土力学课程 持续改进 course achievement degree course goal Analytical Network Process(ANP) soil mechanics course continuous improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献62

  • 1陈国宏,李美娟.组合评价收敛性验证的计算机模拟实验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(5):74-82. 被引量:24
  • 2朱琳.几种组合评价法及其应用分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(3):89-91. 被引量:24
  • 3黄秋明,王正,龚蓓.高等学校教学质量监控与评价体系研究[J].职业技术教育,2003,24(1):19-23. 被引量:142
  • 4教育部财政部关于实施高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革工程的意见(教高[2007]1号)[EB/OL].http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/info24731.htm,2007-01-22/2007-02-28.
  • 5教育部财政部关于实施高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革工程的意见(教高[2007]2号)[EB/OL].http://www.moe.edu.cn/edoas/website18/info25428.htm,2007-01-17/2007-02-28.
  • 6The Engineer of 2020 : Vision of Engineering in the New Century (Washington DC. The National Academies Press, 2004). Educating the Engineer of 2020 : Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century (Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2005).
  • 7B. S. Oberst, R.C. Jones, "International trends in engineering accreditation and quality assurance," in The Many Facets of International Education of Engineers edited by J. Michel (Balkema, Rotterdam, 2000), 1678.
  • 8陈劲,胡建雄.面向创新型国家的高等工程教育[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 9全国工程教育专业认证试点办法[Z].教育部办公厅关于印发《全国工程教育专业认证试点办法》和《全国工程教育专业认证专家委员会章程(暂行)》的通知(教高厅[2007]5号),2007.
  • 10全国工程教育专业认证委员会秘书处.全国工程教育专业认证标准(试行)[A].工程教育专业认证工作手册[D].2007.

共引文献369

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部