期刊文献+

早期不同时机显微夹闭手术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤疗效及预后因素分析 被引量:8

Analysis of curative effect and prognostic factors of early microclamping operation at different times for ruptured intracranial aneurysms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究不同时机显微夹闭手术治疗颅内动脉瘤(IA)的疗效并分析影响预后的因素。方法选择2017年1月至2019年1月于宜宾市第一人民医院神经外科接受显微夹闭手术治疗IA的102例患者,其中男性49例,女性53例;年龄33~72岁,平均年龄56.54岁。比较不同时机(24 h内、48 h内、72 h内)显微夹闭手术患者的一般资料、术后动脉瘤夹闭情况、术后并发症发生情况、治疗效果及患者预后情况;单因素及多因素Logisitic回归分析影响IA患者预后的因素;根据筛选出的独立危险因素构建列线图预测模型并验证。结果不同时机显微夹闭手术患者的一般资料差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);24 h内手术的患者动脉瘤完全夹闭率、恢复良好率、预后良好率显著高于48 h内和72 h内手术的患者(95.24%vs 72.22 vs 40.74%、85.71%vs 74.07%vs 59.26%、95.23%vs 87.04%vs 74.07%;P<0.05);根据出院时格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分,将患者分为预后良好组(87例)和预后不良组(15例)。预后良好组和预后不良组两组患者的年龄、高血压史、术前颅内血肿量、动脉瘤大小、术前Hunt-Hess分级、手术时机、术后并发症、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),均是影响IA患者术后预后的独立危险因素;列线图模型预测患者预后不良率为14.71%,模型评价的实际C-index为0.815,内部验证C-index为0.809,外部验证C-index为0.805,模型符合度较好。结论IA患者动脉瘤破裂后越早(24 h内)进行显微夹闭手术疗效越好,患者年龄、高血压史、术前颅内血肿量、动脉瘤大小、术前Hunt-Hess分级、手术时机、术后并发症、NIHSS评分均是影响IA患者预后不良的独立危险因素。 Objective To explore the efficacy of microclamping surgery at different times for treatment of intracranial aneurysms(IA)and analyze factors affecting prognosis.Methods From January 2017 to January 2019,102 IA patients performed microclamping surgery were enrolled,which included 49 males and 53 females,aged 33-72 years old with mean age of 56.54 years old.The general data,postoperative aneurysm clipping,postoperative complications,treatment effect and prognosis of patients with microscopic clipping at different times(within 24-hour,48-hour and 72-hour)were compared.The univariate and multivariate Logisitic regression were used to analyze the factors affecting prognosis of IA patients;according to screened independent risk factors,the nomogram prediction model were constructed and verified.Results There was no statistically significant difference in general information of patients with microscopic clipping at different times(P>0.05);the complete clipping rate,good recovery rate and good prognosis rate of patients performed aneurysms operation within 24-hour were significantly higher than those within 48-hour and 72-hour(95.24%vs 72.22 vs 40.74%,85.71%vs 74.07%vs 59.26%,95.23%vs 87.04%vs 74.07%;P<0.05).All patients were divided into good prognosis group(n=87)and poor prognosis group(n=15)by Glasgow Outcome Scale(GOS)score at discharge.There were statistical differences in age,hypertension history,preoperative intracranial hematoma,aneurysm size,preoperative Hunt-Hess classification,operation timing,postoperative complications and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)scores between 2 groups(P<0.05),which were all independent risk factors affecting postoperative prognosis of IA patients.The poor prognosis rate of patients predicts by nomogram model was 14.71%,the actual C-index evaluated was 0.815,internally verified C-index was 0.809 and externally verified Cindex was 0.805,which with good model conformity.Conclusion It is demonstrated that the sooner microclamping performed in IA patients after the aneurysm rupture(within 24-hour),the better the effect will be.The age,hypertension history,preoperative intracranial hematoma volume,aneurysm size,preoperative Hunt-Hess classification,and timing of surgery postoperative complications and NIHSS score are all independent risk factors for poor prognosis of IA patients.
作者 吴珂 杨晓滨 李德康 范莉 李洪 刘松 WU Ke;YANG Xiao-bin;LI De-kang;FAN Li;LI Hong;LIU Song(First Department of Neurosurgery,Yibin First People’s Hospital,Yibin 644000,Sichuan,China;Second Department of General Surgery,Yibin The Second Hospital of TCM,Yibin 664010,Sichuan,China)
出处 《生物医学工程与临床》 CAS 2021年第6期702-708,共7页 Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Medicine
关键词 不同时机 显微夹闭手术 颅内动脉瘤 预后 different timing microclamping surgery intracranial aneurysm prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献91

  • 1张镇,杨勇灵,余红,陆斌,腾召君.急诊开颅探查显微夹闭破裂动脉瘤9例分析[J].贵州医药,2011,35(2):125-126. 被引量:2
  • 2Pera J, Korostynski M, Krzyszkowski T. Gene expression pro- files in human ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms: what Is the role of inflammation [J]? Stroke, 2010,41(2): 224-226.
  • 3Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarach- noid an euryamtrial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus en-doeaseulareolling in 2143 patients with raptured inta cranial aneurysms a randomized comparison of effects on survival, de- pendency, seizures, rebleeding subgroup, and aneurysm occlu- sion [J]. Lancet, 2005,366 (9488) :809-917.
  • 4Devara KV, Joseph S, Uppu SC. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage due to coaretation of aorta and intraspina collater- als: a rare presentation [J]. Images Paediatr Cardiol, 2012, 14 (4),1-3.
  • 5Pozzi-Muoelli F, Bruni S, Doddi M, et al. Detection of intracra- nial aneurysms with 64 channel muhidetector row computed tomography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography[Jl. Eur J Radiol, 2007,64(1) : 15-26.
  • 6Sluzewski M, Bosch JA, van Rooij WJ, et al. Rupture of in- tracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils, incidence outcome, and risk factors [J]. J Neurosurg, 2008,11 (6) :238.
  • 7Tang W, Feng H, Chen Z, Microsurgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm: a 120-case analysis [J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2011, ll0(Pt 2) : 141-143.
  • 8Prat R, Galeano I. Early surgical treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms associated with intracerebral haematoma [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2007, 109(5): 431-435.
  • 9Pan JW, Zhan RY, Wen L, et al. Ultra-early surgery for poor- grade intracranial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pre- liminary study [J]. Yonsei Medical Journal, 2009,50(4):521- 524.
  • 10Huh W, Bang JS, Oh CW, et al. Intraeranial aneurysm folloing cranial radiation therapy [J]. J Cerebrovase Endovase Neuro- surg, 2012,14(4) :300-304.

共引文献92

同被引文献94

引证文献8

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部