期刊文献+

三阴性乳腺癌患者血清miR-146a,miR let-7a水平表达与临床病理特征和化疗疗效的相关性研究 被引量:4

Correlation of Serum miR-146a and miR let-7a Expression with Clinicopathological Characteristics and Chemotherapy Efficacy in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究三阴性乳腺癌(triple negative breast cancer, TNBC)患者血清miR-146a和miR let-7a水平表达与临床病理特征和化疗疗效的相关性。方法选择陕西中医药大学附属医院2014年7月~2016年6月行乳腺癌根治术并经免疫组化(immunohistochemical, IHC)检测证实为TNBC的79例患者为研究对象。采用实时荧光定量PCR(quantitative real-time PCR, qRT-PCR)检测血清miR-146a和miR let-7a的水平。相关性采用Spearman秩相关分析。结果血清miR-146a和miR let-7a在肿瘤直径≥3 cm,临床分期Ⅲ期和淋巴结转移的患者中的表达水平高于肿瘤直径<3 cm者,临床分期Ⅰ~Ⅱ期和无淋巴结转移的患者,差异具有统计学意义(t=7.41~10.39,均P <0.05)。TNBC患者化疗后血清miR-146a和miR let-7a表达水平(0.81±0.32和0.60±0.26)显著低于化疗前(1.77±0.51和1.92±0.77),差异具有统计学意义(t=11.31,10.11,均P=0.00)。疾病控制组患者血清miR-146a和miR let-7a表达水平(0.37±0.12和0.51±0.17)低于疾病进展组(1.40±0.79和1.62±0.55),差异具有统计学意义(t=8.97,10.22,均P <0.05)。Spearman秩相关分析显示血清miR-146a和miR let-7a表达水平与化疗疗效呈负相关(r=-0.199,-0.150,均P <0.01)。结论血清miR-146a和miR let-7a表达水平与肿瘤直径、临床分期、淋巴结转移和化疗疗效相关。 Objective To explore the correlation between serum miR-146 a and miR let-7 a expression and clinicopathological characteristics and chemotherapy efficacy in patients with triple negative breast cancer(TNBC). Methods Seventy-nine patients with TNBC who underwent radical mastectomy of breast cancer and were confirmed by immunohistochemical(IHC) detection in the Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of traditional Chinese Medicine from July 2014 to June 2016 were selected as the research subjects. Quantitative real-time PCR(qRT-PCR) was used to detect the levels of serum miR-146 a and miR let-7 a.Spearman rank correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis. Results The expression level of serum miR-146 a and mi R let-7 a in patients with tumor diameter ≥ 3 cm, clinical stage Ⅲ and lymph node metastasis was higher than that in patients with tumor diameter<3 cm, clinical stage Ⅰ~Ⅱ and no lymph node metastasis, and the difference were statistically significant(t=7.41~10.39, all P<0.05). The expression levels of serum miR-146 a and miR let-7 a in TNBC patients after chemotherapy(0.81±0.32 and 0.60±0.26) were significantly lower than those before chemotherapy(1.77±0.51 and 1.92±0.77), and the difference was statistically significant(t=11.31, 10.11, all P=0.00). The expression levels of serum miR-146 a and miR let-7 a in the disease control group(0.37±0.12 and 0.51±0.17) were lower than those in the disease progression group(1.40±0.79 and 1.62±0.55), and the difference was statistically significant(t=8.97, 10.22, all P<0.05). Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that the expression levels of serum miR-146 a and miR let-7 a were negatively correlated with chemotherapy efficacy(r=-0.199,-0.150, all P<0.01). Conclusion The expression levels of serum miR-146 a and miR let-7 a were correlated with tumor diameter,clinical stage, lymph node metastasis and chemotherapy efficacy.
作者 王英英 朱娇 WANG Ying-ying;ZHU Jiao(the Second Oncology Department,Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shaanxi Xianyang 712000,China;Department of Oncology Hematology,521 Hospital of Norinco Group,Xi’an 710065,China)
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2021年第6期60-63,共4页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 三阴性乳腺癌 MIR-146A miR let-7a 临床病理特征 triple negative breast cancer miR-146a miR let-7a clinicopathological features
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献65

  • 1吴传勇,薛剑,娄加陶.microRNA在肺癌诊断、治疗及预后判断中的作用[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2011,31(3):368-372. 被引量:7
  • 2Perou C M, Sorlie T, Eisen M-B, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumors [J]. Nature, 2000,406(6797) :747-752.
  • 3van't Veer L J, Dai H, van de Vijver M J, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer [J ]. Nature, 2002,415(6871 ) : 530-536.
  • 4Sotiriou C, Neo S Y, McShane L M, et al. Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population based study [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003,100(18) : 10393-10398.
  • 5Rakha E A, El-Sayed M E, Green A R, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Cancer, 2007, 109( 1 ) : 25-32.
  • 6Jones C, Nonni A V, Fulford L, et al. CGH analysis of ductal carcinoma of the breast with basaloid/myoepithelial cell differentiation [ J ]. Br J Cancer, 2001,85 ( 3 ) : 422-427.
  • 7Nielsen T O, Hsu F D, Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10 (16) :5367-5374.
  • 8Banerjee S, Reis-Filho J S, Ashley S, et al. Basal-like breast carcinomas: clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy [J]. J Clin Pathol, 2006,59(7):729-735.
  • 9Carey L A, Dees E C, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox : primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007,13(8) :2329-2334.
  • 10Chu K C, Lamar C A, Freeman H P. Racial disparities in breast carcinoma survival rates: separating factors that affect diagnosis from factors that affect treatment [J]. Cancer, 2003, 97( 11 ) : 2853-2860.

共引文献351

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部