摘要
同行评议就是能同能力、同资格的人审慎的进行鉴定、检查的方法。作为一种应用范围广泛的科研评价机制,在实践的过程中,同行评议制度在一定程度上可以彰显科研工作者的独立精神。但同时,这种评审制度也受到了评议结果非客观性等质疑。只有通过改进评议专家选择办法、设置不同补充办法等多种手段完善同行评议制度,才能使评议结果更加客观、公正。
As a scientific research evaluation mechanism with a wide range of applications,peer review system can demonstrate the independent spirit of researchers to a certain extent in the process of practice.But at the same time,the evaluation system is also questioned by the objectivity of the evaluation results.Only by improving the methods of expert selection and setting up different supplementary methods can the peer review system be perfected,so as to make the review results more objective and just.
作者
李羿
Li Yi(jilin university,changchun)
出处
《高教研究与实践》
2021年第3期42-45,共4页
Research and Practice on Higher Education
关键词
同行
评议人
遴选
申诉
Peer
Review
The selection
The complaint