期刊文献+

新冠肺炎疫情背景下政府规制网络谣言的范围与边界 被引量:2

The Scope and Boundary of Government Regulation on Internet Rumors Under the Background of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在网络谣言的治理体系中政府规制扮演着重要的角色,尤其在新冠肺炎疫情的背景下,这种重要作用更加得以凸显。基于网络谣言已经逸出言论自由的范围和保障公共利益的需要,政府规制网络谣言具有正当性基础。但是,能够纳入政府规制的网络谣言在范围上并不能与传统的谣言相等同,前提须为具有可规范因素。通过梳理理论界及法律文本中关于网络谣言的认知与规定,本文发现网络谣言的范围一般包括虚假的、无事实根据的、非官方权威来源的和未经证实的信息。由于“非官方权威来源的信息”与“未经证实的信息”具有真伪不确定性,不宜直接纳入政府规制的网络谣言范围,而需要进一步廓清其法律边界。以这种不确定的信息作为规制的对象,政府适宜采取谦抑性态度,在符合法律保留原则、比例原则和正当程序原则的基础上,综合考量信息的发布主体、目的、受众范围、发布者与传播者的主观感受、社会危害程度等因素后审慎介入。 Government regulation plays an important role in the governance system of internet rumors,especially in the context of novel coronavirus pneumonia,this important role is more prominent.Based on the fact that internet rumors have escaped the scope of freedom of speech and the need to protect public interests,the government has a legitimate basis for regulating internet rumors.However,internet rumors that can be included in government regulation are not equal to traditional rumors in scope,provided that they have prescriptive factors.By combing the cognitions and regulations of internet rumors in the theoretical circles and legal texts,the paper finds that the scope of internet rumors generally includes false,unfounded,unofficial authoritative sources and unconfirmed information.Due to the uncertainty of the authenticity of"information from unofficial authoritative sources"and"unconfirmed information",it is not suitable to be directly included in the scope of internet rumors regulated by the government,but its legal boundaries need to be further clarified.Taking this kind of uncertain information as the object of regulation,the government should adopt a modest attitude.We should be carefully intervened not only on the basis of compliance with the principle of legal reservation,proportionality and due process,but also considering the factors such as the information publisher,purpose,target audience,the subjective feelings of the publisher and the disseminator,and the degree of social harm and other factors.
作者 冯莉 FENG Li(Law School,Dongbei University of Finance and Economics,Dalian 116025,China)
出处 《东北财经大学学报》 2021年第6期88-96,共9页 Journal of Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
基金 辽宁省教育厅科学研究经费项目“政府数据开放中个人数据保护的公法思考”(LN2020J08)。
关键词 网络谣言 新冠肺炎疫情 政府规制 internet rumors novel coronavirus pneumonia government regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献80

  • 1周光辉,周笑梅.互联网对国家的冲击与国家的回应[J].政治学研究,2001(2):37-46. 被引量:58
  • 2王国宁.从传播学角度看谣言及其控制[J].新闻与传播研究,1991(1):41-56. 被引量:14
  • 3黄升民,杨雪睿.碎片化:品牌传播与大众传媒新趋势[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2005,27(6):6-12. 被引量:116
  • 4祝华新.《网民成为压力集团是国家进步的象征》,《中国青年报》2009年12月30日.
  • 5Mark Granovetter.Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness.American Journal of Sociol-ogy,1985(91):481–510.
  • 6Becker,Murphy.A Theory of Rational Addiction.Journalof Political Economy,1988(4):675-700.
  • 7赵克锋.中国防火长城——互联网审查的法律经济学[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2010.121-152.
  • 8[美]李侃如.治理中国:从革命到改革[M].胡国成、赵梅译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.188-199.
  • 9[美]马克.波斯特.互联网怎么了[M].易容译.开封:河南大学出版社,2010.89-145.
  • 10[美]曼纽尔.卡斯特.网络星河:对互联网、商业和社会的反思[M].郑波,武炜译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.153-207.

共引文献181

同被引文献39

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部