摘要
如何规范与约束公权力,是古今中外政治研究者与实践者共同关注的重要命题。中国问责制度的演变经历了从问责实践到问责制度形成、行政问责和党内问责并轨到党内问责与行政监察问责互相补充配合出发的过程,可从中看出我国问责制度的变化成因与演变逻辑。理论上建基于竞争性选举的西方问责制度具有局限性,其只聚焦于欧美的历史传统与政治经验,政治极化和权力恶斗还削弱了它的实际运作成效。通过对我国问责制度的实践脉络和演变逻辑进行分析可以发现,中国问责制度的实践以授权和问责合一为依托,在党政领域共同发力,由此突破了以竞争性选举为中心的问责实现路径。问责制度的演变是我国制度体系不断变化与完善的缩影,对问责制度的形成脉络和演变逻辑进行学理分析,对于理解全面从严治党、规范党政公权力运行,理解我国的政治发展逻辑具有理论与实践层面的双重意义。
How to regulate and restrict public power is an important proposition of common concern to political researchers and practitioners at all times and in all countries.The evolution of China's accountability system has experienced the process from accountability practice to the formation of accountability system,the integration of administrative accountability and inner-party accountability to the mutual supplement and cooperation between inner-party accountability and administrative supervision accountability,which reveals the causes and evolution logic of China's accountability system.Theoretically,the Western accountability system based on competitive election has limitations.It only focuses on the historical traditions and political experience of Europe and America.Political polarization and power struggle also weaken its actual operation effect.Through the analysis of the practical context and evolution logic of our accountability system,it can be found that the practice of China's accountability system relies on the integration of authorization and accountability and makes joint efforts in the field of Party and government,thus breaking through the path of accountability centered on competitive election.The evolution of accountability system is the epitome of the continuous change and improvement of China's institutional system.A theoretical analysis of the formation context and evolution logic of accountability system is of dual significance for understanding the comprehensive and strict governance of the party,standardizing the operation of the party and government's public power,and understanding the logic of China's political development at the theoretical and practical levels.
作者
宋艳玲
夏飞朋
Song Yanling;Xia Feipeng(Teaching and Research Department of Party History and Building,Party School of Heilongjiang Provincial Committee of C.P.C.,Harbin 150080,China;School of International Relations&Public Affairs,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处
《学术交流》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第9期19-29,191,共12页
Academic Exchange
关键词
公权力
问责制度
行政问责
党内问责
public power
accountability system
administrative accountability
inner party accountability