《史记》称引《论语》新考

New Investigation on Historical Records cited Analects of Confucius

有关《史记》称引《论语》传本系统及方式问题,前代学者研究尚有空白。从《论语》在汉代的流传、《史记》所称《论语》书名、《史记》所引《论语》文本三个方面综合讨论,判定《史记》所称引《论语》系《古论语》。在内容上,《史记》所引《论语》多同孔安国、郑玄校注本《古论语》,而与汉石经本、定州竹简本《鲁论语》异。在判定《史记》所称引《论语》文本性质的基础上,对《史记》称引《论语》的不同方式作了例释。

Since there are still some void contents in the previous scholars’researches on the systematic edition and modes of Analects of Confucius cited in Historical Records,this paper makes a comprehensive discussion from the three aspects,the broadcast on Analects of Confucius in the Han dynasty,the book’s name in Historical Records as Analects of Confucius,and the texts of Analects of Confucius quoted by Historical Records.Then it concludes that Analects of Confucius quoted Historical Records was the ancient version.In terms of content,Analects of Confucius quoted in Historical Records are mostly the same as the ancient version annotated by Kong Anguo and Zheng Xuan,but it’s different from the ancient version annotated by The Han Scriptures and The Lu Analects.On the basis of judging the textual nature of Analects of Confucius cited in Historical Records,it makes an example of the different ways of relevant quoting.