摘要
社会工作服务效果评估内嵌了因果律。受因果律本体论假定的影响,社会工作服务效果评估通常有两种方法,一种用社会科学研究方法探索经验层次服务与结果之间的规则性联系,另一种用理论来解释经验层次规则性联系。前者属于统计学解释,后者属于机制性解释。为整合统计学解释与机制性解释,文章以实用主义的机制内涵和过程追踪法为指导,提出“经验−方法−理论”和“理论−方法−经验”两种不同的社会工作服务效果评估策略。
Causality is embedded in the effectsevaluation of social work services.Influenced by the ontology of causality,there are two approaches to evaluate the effects of social work services.One is to explore the regular relationship between services and results based on social science research methods,and the other is to explain the regular relationship between services and results based on theory.The former belongs to statistical interpretation,while the latter belongs to mechanism interpretation.In order to integrate the statistical interpretation and the mechanism interpretation,under the guidance of pragmatism mechanism and process tracing,this paper puts forward two different methods of social work service effect evaluation:“experiencemethod-theory”and“theory-method-experience”.
作者
刘江
顾东辉
LIU Jiang;GU Donghui(School of Public Affairs,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing,210094,China;School of Social Development and Public Policy,Fudan University,Shanghai,200433,China)
出处
《社会工作与管理》
2021年第6期5-13,共9页
Social Work and Management
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国特色社会工作制度体系研究”(19ZDA144)
国家社会科学基金青年项目“新时代社会工作服务的赋权评估实践体系研究”(21CSH065)
江苏省社会科学基金一般项目“江苏省基层社区能力与居民生活质量关系研究”(18SHD002)。
关键词
社会工作评估
因果机制
方法为本
理论驱动
social work evaluation
causal mechanism
method-based
theory-driven