商标描述性正当使用构成要件研究

Research on the Constituent Requirements of Descriptive Fair Use of Trademarks

在商标法领域,描述性正当使用的构成要件相关问题尚有争议,其中主要的争议点在于描述性正当使用的构成条件中是否应当添加客观上不存在混淆的可能性。本文通过对比美国及其他国家有关描述性正当使用构成要件的规定,从历史原因、逻辑的合理性和价值取向三方面论证了二要件说的正当性。

In the field of trademark law,there are still controversies concerning the constituent requirements of descriptive fair use.The major dispute is whether“objectively non-existent likelihood of confusion”should be added to the constituent requirements of descriptive fair use.This article compares the provisions of the United States and other countries and regions on the constituent requirements of descriptive fair use,and demonstrates the legitimacy of the“two requirements”in terms of historical reasons,logical rationality and value orientation.