期刊文献+

列车一维碰撞能量管理的综合评价模型 被引量:1

Comprehensive Evaluation Model for One-Dimensional Crash Energy Management of Trains
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了更科学全面地对列车碰撞能量方案进行配置和评价,以列车最大平均加速度、最大瞬时加速度和能量利用率为评价指标,利用序关系分析法和熵值法得到的主、客观指标权重推导出更加合理的综合权重系数;采用非线性加权综合法融合权重信息和评价指标信息,获得了列车一维碰撞能量管理综合评价模型;采用此模型对某型列车的15种能量配置方案进行综合评价.研究结果表明:此模型综合评价结果与各指标性能变化幅度分析结果一致,具有较好的适用性和可靠性;方案4为最优方案,其最大瞬时加速度指标性能比方案8下降14.03%,但最大平均加速度指标性能和能量利用率指标性能分别比方案8提升了4.92%和19.44%;该结果既体现了对安全性影响最大的最大平均加速度指标的重要性,又综合考虑了与经济性相关的能量利用率指标. In order to configure and evaluate the train collision energy scheme more scientifically and comprehensively,the maximum average acceleration,maximum instantaneous acceleration and energy utilization rate of trains were taken as evaluation indexes,and a more reasonable comprehensive weight coefficient was derived by using the subjective and objective index weights obtained by the order relation analysis and entropy method.A comprehensive evaluation model of train one-dimensional collision energy management was obtained by fusing weight information and evaluation index information with nonlinear weighted synthesis method,then 15 energy allocation schemes of a certain type of train were comprehensively evaluated by using this model.The results indicate that the comprehensive evaluation results are consistent with that of the change range of all indexes,and it has better applicability and reliability.Scheme 4 is the optimal scheme,in which the maximum instantaneous acceleration index decreases by 14.03%,but the maximum average acceleration index and energy utilization rate index increase by 4.92%and 19.44%compared with scheme 8 respectively.These results both reflect the importance of the maximum average acceleration index,which has the greatest impact on safety,and comprehensively considers the energy utilization rate index related to economy.
作者 张敬科 朱涛 王小瑞 肖守讷 阳光武 杨冰 ZHANG Jingke;ZHU Tao;WANG Xiaorui;XIAO Shoune;YANG Guangwu;YANG Bing(State Key Laboratory of Traction Power,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)
出处 《西南交通大学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期1329-1336,共8页 Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金(52172409) 四川省杰出青年基金(22JCQN0156)。
关键词 碰撞能量管理 序关系分析法 熵值法 综合评价模型 crash energy management order relationship analysis method entropy method comprehensive evaluation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献53

  • 1高传东,崔鹏,吴国雄.山区灾害多发区段路线方案的多级模糊综合评价[J].重庆交通学院学报,2006,25(2):70-72. 被引量:4
  • 2王学军,郭亚军,兰天.构造一致性判断矩阵的序关系分析法[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(1):115-118. 被引量:55
  • 3刘建,郑双忠,邓云峰,李安贵,宋存义.基于G1法的应急能力评估指标权重的确定[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(1):30-33. 被引量:87
  • 4刘万里,雷治军.关于AHP中判断矩阵校正方法的研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(6):30-34. 被引量:110
  • 5Saaty T L. Concepts, theory and techniques; rank generation, preservation and reversal in AHP[J]. Decision Sciences, 1987,18(1):157- 177.
  • 6Saaty T L. Decision making with the AHP: why is the principal eigenvector necessary [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,145 (1):85 - 91.
  • 7Bryan N, Mobolurin A. An action learning evaluation procedure for multiple criteria decision making problems[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1995,96(2):379 - 386.
  • 8Saaty T L, Vargas L G.Inconsistency and rank preservation[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1984,28(2):205 - 214.
  • 9Crawford G, William C A. A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1985,29(5) :387 - 405.
  • 10Tam C Y, Tummala V M. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system [J].International Journal of Management Science, 2001, 29(2) : 171 - 182.

共引文献112

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部