期刊文献+

《超说明书用药循证评价规范》团体标准解读 被引量:21

Interpretation on the Specification of Evidence-based Pharmaceutical Evaluation Method for Off-label Drug Use
原文传递
导出
摘要 2021年5月,广东省药学会发布了由中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院起草的《超说明书用药循证评价规范》团体标准(T/GDPA 1-2021),为超说明书用药提供了循证评估指引。本文对该标准进行了介绍,以期帮助临床医师与药学人员掌握超说明书用药循证评价的方法与流程,从而进一步促进超说明书用药的合理使用与规范管理,并探索建立具有中国特色的超说明书用药循证评价体系。 In May 2021, Guangdong Pharmaceutical Association released the group standard(T/GDPA1-2021) of evidence-based evaluation specification for off-label drug use drafted by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, thus providing evidence-based assessment guidance for off-label drug use. In this paper, the standard was introduced in order to help clinicians and pharmacy personnel to master the methods and procedures of evidence-based evaluation for off-label drug use, thus further promoting the rational use and standardized management for off-label drug use, and explore the establishment of its evidence-based evaluation system with Chinese characteristics.
作者 邱凯锋 何志超 陈泽鹏 朱建红 郑志华 伍俊妍 QIU Kaifeng;HE Zhichao;CHEN Zepeng;ZHU Jianhong;ZHENG Zhihua;WU Junyan(Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510120,China;Guangdong Pharmaceutical Association,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510080,China)
出处 《今日药学》 CAS 2021年第11期811-814,共4页 Pharmacy Today
关键词 超说明书用药 循证评价 规范 解读 off-label drug use evidence-based evaluation specification interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1张波,李大魁,杨晓.药品说明书之外的用法的若干问题及对策[J].中华风湿病学杂志,2004,8(8):451-453. 被引量:40
  • 2詹思延.临床指南研究与评价工具简介[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2007,2(5):375-377. 被引量:46
  • 3Slim K,Nini E,Forestier D,et al. Methodological index for non- randomized studies(minors):development and validation of a new instrument[J]. ANZ J Surg,2003,73(9):712-6.
  • 4Reisch JS,Tyson JE,Mize SG. Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies[J]. Pediatrics,1989,84(5):815-27.
  • 5Des Jarlais DC,Lyles C,Crepaz N,TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions:the TREND statement[J]. Am J Public Health,2004,94(3):361-6.
  • 6Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Reitsma JB,et al. The development of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2003,3:25.
  • 7Whiting P,Rutjes AW,Dinnes J,et al. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies[J]. Health Technol Assess,2004,8(25):iii,1-234.
  • 8Higgins JPT,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration,2011[J]. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 9Deeks JJ,Bossuyt PM,Gatsonis C. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0. The Cochrane Collaboration,2009[J]. http://srdta.cochrmle.org.
  • 10CASP(Critical Skills Appraisal Programme)[EB/OL]. [2012-10-01]. http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-contenffuploads/2011 / 11/C ASP_Diagno stic Appraisal_Checklist_14oct 10.pdf.

共引文献527

同被引文献250

引证文献21

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部