期刊文献+

“但是”与“可是”的辨析及偏误分析

Discrimination and Error Analysis of Chinese Characters“danshi”and“keshi”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用北京大学汉语语言研究中心CCL语料库(现代汉语语料库)内的相关语料,对近义词“但是”与“可是”这两个词从语法意义、句法和语用三个方面进行分析,比较它们的异同,归纳把汉语作为第二语言的学习者在习得过程中的偏误类型,并尝试提出相应的教学策略。 Based on the relevant corpus in CCL Corpus(Modern Chinese Corpus)of Peking University Chinese language Research Center,this paper analyzes the synonyms“danshi”and“keshi”from three aspects of grammatical meaning,syntax and pragmatics,compares their similarities and differences,sums up the types of errors in the acquisition of Chinese as a second language,and puts forward the corresponding teaching strategies.
作者 赵绒绒 ZHAO Rong-rong(College of Arts,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,Shaanxi;Yanta Aerospace Primary School,Xi'an 710119,Shaanxi)
出处 《陇东学院学报》 2021年第6期25-29,共5页 Journal of Longdong University
关键词 “但是” “可是” 语法 语用 偏误 “danshi” “keshi” grammar pragmatic error
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:175
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献2281

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部