关于渤海早期王城坐标点的文献学定位问题

On the Location of Bohai Kingdom Capital in the Early Stage From the Perspective of Bibliography

从文献学定位角度,渤海早期王城应在“桂娄故地”去寻找,而不是在“挹娄故地”去寻找。“其地在营州之东二千里”的数据坐标点应是指大钦茂以后的王城即上京城的所在地,而不应是指渤海立国之初王城的始居之地。另外,“保太白山之东北”的地理定位,亦应是指大钦茂以后的王城的所在地,而不应是指渤海立国之初王城的始居之地。故渤海早期王城遗址的探究,应进一步扩大视野,并进--步关注太白山之南,亦即“桂娄故地”的考古发现。

From the viewpoint of bibliography,the capital of Bohai Kingdom in the early stage should lie in“the old haunt of Guilou”,not“the old haunt of Yilou”.“Lying 2000 li east of Yingzhou”should refer to the location of the Upper Capital of Bohai Kingdom after the Stage of Daqinmao(the third Emperor of Bohai Kingdom),rather than that of the capital in the early stage when Bohai Kingdom was initially founded.“Guarding the northeast of Taibai Mountains”should also refer to the capital location after the Daqinmao stage,not the one when Bohai Kingdong was established,either.Therefore,study of the capital location of the early stage should expand the horizon,and focus on the archaeological discoveries of the old haunt of Guilou,south of Taibai Mountains.