辽、金春州再考

Restudy on Chunzhou of Liao and Jin Dynasty

文章作者查阅梳理了《辽史》《金史》及其他相关史料后认为,仅仅确定辽代春州为辽史中失载州的概念是不够的。《辽史》《金史》《三朝北盟会编》等历史文献中有关辽、金春州凡33见,这说明了春州不仅存在于辽朝,在金初依然是与辽朝交涉、通往中原的重要枢纽。同时,《金史》中曾多次提到“春州”,这也是证明春州存在的重要依据。文章作者结合历史文献对内蒙古兴安盟科右中旗所发现的两处“春州”墨书题字进行了研究后发现,这两处“春州”墨书题字均有着极为深刻的历史背景。同时,对辽、金春州的考证,还可以解决辽金时期长春河、浑河、豹子崖、部堵泊等一系列重要历史地理问题。最后,作者提出了十五条依据,以证明辽、金春州存在的真实性和客观性,并根据考证得出春州与长春州地名的由来,特别是对于辽朝诏改达鲁河为“长春河”的地名,以及长春河与洮儿河、蛟流河、春州、长春州的关系等提出了新的见解。

After consulting and combing“The History of Liao”,“The History of Jin”and other relevant historical materials,it is believed that it is not enough to determine the concept of Chunzhou in Liao Dynasty as the lost state in Liao history.In the books mentioned above,along with“Compilation of the Three North Alliance”and other historical records,it is claimed that Chunzhou was not only in Liao Dynasty but also an important hub to the central plain,where at the beginning of Jin Dynasty it was route to Liao.Meanwhile,“Chunzhou”was referred several times in“The History of Jin”,which is vital evidence for the existence of“Chunzhou”.Combined with historical documents,the author studied the two inscriptions of“Chunzhou”found in Keyouzhong Banner,Xing’an League,Inner Mongolia.It is found that the inscriptions of“Chunzhou”have a very profound historical background.At the same time,the textual research of Liao and Chunzhou of Jin can also solve a series of important historical and geographical problems such as Changchun River,Hun River,Leopard Cliff,etc.in Liao and Jin Dynasties.Finally,the author put forward 15 bases to prove the authenticity and objectivity of the existence of Liao and Chunzhou of Jin,and obtains the origin of the place names of Chunzhou and Changchun according to the textual research,especially put forward new opinions on the place names of Dalu River changing to“Changchun River”by the Liao Dynasty,as well as the relationship between Changchun River and Tao’er River,Jiaoliu River,Chunzhou and Changchun.