期刊文献+

寰枢椎脱位行寰枢椎后路融合手术后的下颈椎曲度变化情况及其预测因素 被引量:2

Changes and predictive factors of lower cervical curvature after posterior atlantoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial dislocation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨寰枢椎脱位(atlantoaxial dislocation,AAD)患者行寰枢椎后路融合手术后的下颈椎曲度变化情况,并分析其潜在的预测因素。方法纳入本院自2012年1月~2019年3月采用寰枢椎后路固定融合手术治疗的31例AAD患者作为研究对象,统计所有患者的性别、年龄和手术前后的下颈椎曲度(C_(2)-C_(7)角)、其他颈椎矢状面参数[包括:枕颈角(C_(0)-C_(2)角),C_(1)-C_(2)角,颈椎前凸角(C_(0)-C_(7)角),颈椎矢状面轴向垂直距离(C_(2)-C_(7)sagittal vertical axis,C_(2)-C_(7)SVA),T_(1)倾斜角(T_(1)slope,T_(1)S),颈部倾斜角(neck tilt,NT)和胸廓入口角(thoracic inlet angle,TIA)]变化情况。随访观察术后C_(2)-C_(7)角变化情况,若有所减小,则视为下颈椎曲度减小(A组);若有所增加或不变者,纳入B组。对两组患者性别、年龄等人口学资料,以及手术前后的相关颈椎矢状位参数进行单因素分析;并以二分类Logistic回归分析对相关因素进行多因素分析。结果31例AAD患者均顺利完成后路寰枢椎固定融合术,术后获访9~15个月、平均(12.1±2.8)个月,术后出现下颈椎曲度减小者9(29.03%)例。单因素分析显示,术前C_(2)-C_(7)角、术后C_(1)-C_(2)角存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,术前C_(2)-C_(7)角≥20°(OR=8.276,P=0.001)和术后C_(1)-C_(2)角≥20°(OR=6.754,P=0.013),均是AAD患者术后下颈椎曲度减小的独立预测因素。结论下颈椎曲度减小在AAD患者行寰枢椎后路固定融合手术后并不少见,术前C_(2)-C_(7)角≥20°、术后C_(1)-C_(2)角≥20°可增加其发生风险。 Objective To investigate the changes of lower cervical curvature in patients with atlantoaxial dislocation(AAD)after posterior atlantoaxial fusion,and analyze its potential predictors.Methods From January 2012 to March 2019,31 patients with AAD who underwent posterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion in our hospital were selected in this research.The gender,age,lower cervical curvature(C_(2)-C_(7)angle)and other parameters of cervical sagittal plane[including occipito cervical angle(C_(0)-C_(2)angle),C_(1)-C_(2)angle,cervical lordosis angle(C_(0)-C_(7)angle),C_(2)-C_(7)sagital vertical axis(SVA),T_(1)slope(T_(1)S),neck tilt(NT)and thoracic inlet angle(TIA)]were measured.The changes of C_(2)-C_(7)angle after operation were followed up.If the C_(2)-C_(7)angle decreased,it was regarded as lower cervical curvature decreased(group A);if the C_(2)-C_(7)angle increased or remained unchanged,it was included in group B.The gender,age and other demographic data of the two groups,as well as the relevant cervical sagittal parameters before and after surgery were analyzed by univariate analysis,and the related factors were analyzed by binary logistic regression analysis.Results All 31 AAD patients successfully completed posterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion.The average follow-up period was(12.1±2.8)months(ranged 9-15 months).Univariate analysis showed that preoperative C_(2)-C_(7)angle and postoperative C_(1)-C_(2)angle had statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative C_(2)-C_(7)angle≥20°(OR=8.276,P=0.001)and postoperative C_(1)-C_(2)angle≥20°(OR=6.754,P=0.013)were independent predictors of lower cervical curvature reduction in AAD patients.Conclusion Lower cervical curvature reduction is not uncommon in AAD patients after posterior atlantoaxial fixation and fusion.Preoperative C_(2)-C_(7)angle≥20°and postoperative C_(1)-C_(2)angle≥20°can increase the risk of lower cervical curvature reduction.
作者 宁凡友 王冲 孔丽 NING Fan-you;WANG Chong;KONG Li(Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital(Orthopaedic Hospital of Henan Province),Luoyang,Henan,471000,China)
出处 《颈腰痛杂志》 2021年第6期763-767,共5页 The Journal of Cervicodynia and Lumbodynia
基金 宁夏回族自治区自然科学基金(编号:NZ16212)。
关键词 寰枢椎脱位 寰枢椎后路融合术 下颈椎曲度 预测因素 atlantoaxial dislocation posterior atlantoaxial fusion lower cervical curvature predictive factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献59

  • 1谭明生,张光铂.浅谈寰枢椎脱位的治疗选择与手术适应证[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(5):330-331. 被引量:41
  • 2Huang DG, Hao DJ, He BR, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixa- tion: a review of all techniques[J]. Spine J, 2015, 15(10): 2271-2281.
  • 3Kim JY, Oh CH, Yoon SH, et al. Comparison of outcomes after atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws and screw- rod constructs[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2014, 55(5): 255- 260.
  • 4Ohya J, Chikuda H, Kato S, et al. Risks of in-hospital death and complications after fusion surgery in patients with at- lantoaxial subluxation:analysis of 1090 patients using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(4): 603-607.
  • 5Passias PG, Wang SL, Kozanek M, et al. Relationship be- tween the alignment of the occipitoaxial and subaxial cervical spine in patients with congenital atlantoxial dislocations[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2013, 26(1): 15-21.
  • 6Guo X, Ni B, Xie N, et al. Bilateral C1-C2 transarticular screw and C1 laminar hook fixation and bone graft fusion for reducible atlantoaxial dislocation:a seven-year analysis of out- come[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87676.
  • 7Ni B, Zhou FJ, Guo QF, et al. Modified technique for CI-2 screw-rod fixation and fusion using autogenous bicortical iliac crest graft[J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21(1): 156-164.
  • 8Gautschi OP, Payer M, Corniola MV, et al. Chnically relevant complications related to posterior atlanto-axial fixation in at- lanto-axial instability and their management [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2014, 123: 131-135.
  • 9Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, et al. Biomechani- cal testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques [J]. Spine, 2002, 27(22): 2435-2440.
  • 10Paik SC, Chun HJ, Bak KH, et al. Unilateral C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability in rheumatoid arthritis patients: comparison with the bilateral method[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2015, 57(6): 460-464.

共引文献20

同被引文献17

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部