“定县模式”与“邹平模式”比较研究

A Comparative Study of“Dingxian Model”and“Zouping Model”

20世纪二三十年代,中国的知识分子发起了一场旨在救治农村的乡村建设运动,对当时的中国社会产生了巨大影响。其中,尤以“定县模式”和“邹平模式”影响最大。为了更好地认识这两种模式,有必要对其进行比较研究。二者除了在目的、内容和结局等方面存在共同点外,还存在很多的不同点,主要表现在领导人文化背景的不同、指导思想的不同和出发点的不同。对“定县模式”和“邹平模式”进行比较研究,不仅有利于我们更好地理解乡村建设运动,而且为解决当今日益凸显的“三农”问题提供了重要的启示和参考。

In the 1920s and 1930s,Chinese intellectuals launched a rural construction movement aimed at treating and curing rural areas,which had a great impact on the Chinese society at that time.Among them,“Dingxian model”and“Zouping model”have the greatest influence.In order to better understand the two models,it is necessary to make a comparative study.In addition to the common points in purpose,content and outcome,there are also many differences between them,which are mainly reflected in the different cultural background,guiding ideology and starting point of leaders.The comparative study of“Dingxian model”and“Zouping model”not only helps us better understand the rural construction movement,but also provides important enlightenment and reference for solving the increasingly prominent“three rural issues”.