摘要
目的探讨高通量血液透析(HFHD)在改善终末期肾病患者炎症状态及细胞免疫中的应用效果。方法选取2017年12月至2020年12月南阳市南阳宝树透析中心收治的136例终末期肾病患者,按照透析方式的不同分为HFHD组76例和常规血液透析(CHD)组60例。两组透析3个月后评估其治疗效果,比较治疗前后微炎性状态[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6),C反应蛋白(CRP)]、细胞免疫功能[CD4^(+)、CD8^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)]的变化情况。结果与CHD组相比,HFHD组治疗后临床疗效更高(89.47%vs.70.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与CHD组相比,HFHD组透析3个月后IL-6、CRP、TNF-α降低程度更好,CD4^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)升高程度更好,且CD8^(+)降低程度更好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论HFHD在改善终末期肾病患者微炎性状态及细胞免疫方面的效果优于CHD,患者能够获得更为满意的治疗效果。
【Objective】To investigate the effect of high-throughput hemodialysis in improving the inflammatory state and cellular immunity in patients with end-stage nephropathy.【Methods】A total of 136 patients with end-stage nephropathy were selected from December 2017 to December 2020.They were divided into high-throughput hemodialysis(HFHD)group with 76 cases and conventional hemodialysis(CHD)group with 60 cases according to the different methods of hemodialysis.After dialysis for 3 months,the therapeutic effect was evaluated,and the changes of the inflammatory state(TNF-α,IL-6,CRP),cellular immunity function(CD 4^(+),CD 8^(+),CD 4^(+)/CD 8^(+))were compared before and after treatment.【Results】Compared with CHD group,the clinical effect of HFHD group was higher(89.47%vs.70.00%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with CHD group,the reduction of IL-6,CRP,TNF-αwas better in HFHD group after 3 months dialysis,the level of CD 4^(+),CD 4^(+)/CD 8^(+)increased,the degree of CD 8^(+)decreased better,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).【Conclusion】High throughput hemodialysis is better than that of conventional hemodialysis in improving the inflammatory state and cellular immunity of patients with end-stage nephropathy,and can obtain more satisfactory therapeutic effect.
作者
刘香红
LIU Xianghong(Nanyang Baoshu Dialysis Center,Nanyang,Henan 473006,China)
出处
《中国医学工程》
2021年第12期93-96,共4页
China Medical Engineering
关键词
终末期肾病
高通量血液透析
微炎性状态
细胞免疫
end-stage nephropathy
high throughput hemodialysis
microinflammatory state
cellular immunity