期刊文献+

Wells评分联合校正的D-二聚体对肺癌合并急性肺栓塞的预测价值 被引量:6

The Predictive Value of Wells Score Combined with Adjusted D-Dimers for Lung Cancer with Acute Pulmonary Embolism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨Wells评分联合校正的D-二聚体对肺癌合并急性肺栓塞的预测价值。方法:选取2013年11月至2020年11月在承德医学院附属医院住院的肺癌疑似APE患者130例,评价上述患者Wells评分、校正D-二聚体及两者联合时对APE的预测价值。结果:130例疑诊APE的肺癌患者中,确诊APE67例。经过Wells评分,低度可能组、中度可能组、高度可能组分别41例、72例、17例,其中确诊APE分别为14例、39例、33例,其肺癌合并APE诊断敏感度分为20.90%、58.21%、20.90%,特异性分为57.14%、47.62%、95.24%,阳性预测值分为34.15%、54.17%、82.35%,阴性预测值分为65.85%、45.83%、7.65%。校正的D-二聚体值(981ng/m L)与传统的D-二聚体值(500ng/m L)相比,诊断肺癌合并APE的特异性升高(42.86%vs23.81%,P<0.05)。Wells评分低度可能结合校正D-二聚体阴性者,其诊断肺癌合并APE的阴性预测价值可升至94.44%。130例疑似APE的肺癌患者的D-二聚体的ROC曲线,提示D-二聚体的临界值为1975ng/m L,高于传统的D二聚体临界值500ng/m L。结论:Wells评分低度可能联合校正D-二聚体阴性时有利于除外肺癌患者中的疑似APE患者,而且肺癌合并肺栓塞患者往往具有较高水平的D-二聚体。 Objective:To investigate the predictive value of Wells score combined with adjusted D-dimers for lung cancer complicated with acute pulmonary embolism.Methods:From November 2013 to November 2020,130 lung cancer patients suspected for APE were admitted to the affiliated hospital of Chengde Medical University.The predictive value of Wells score,adjusted D-dimer and combination of the above were respectively estimated.Results:Among 130 APE suspected cases,67 were confirmed.After Wells scoring,patients were divided into low-potential group(41 cases),medium-potential group(72 cases),high-potential group(17 cases),and confirmed APE were 14 cases,39 cases,33 cases respectively.The sensitivity of diagnosis of lung cancer combining APE was 20.90%,58.21%,20.90%respectively.The specificity was 57.14%,47.62%,95.24%respectively.The positive predictive values were 34.15%,54.17%,82.35%respectively.The negative predictive values were 65.85%,45.83%and 7.65%respectively.The adjusted D-dimer value(981ng/mL),compared with the traditional D-dimer value(500ng/mL),has an increased specificity of diagnosis of lung cancer with APE(42.86%vs23.81%,P<0.05).To the negative patients whose Wells score revealed low potential of combining adjusted D-dimer negative,the negative predictive value of diagnosis of lung cancer combining APE can rise to 99.45%.ROC curves of D-dimers in 130 lung cancer patients with suspected APE reveal that the critical value of D-dimer is 1975ng/mL,higher than the conventional 500ng/mL.Conclusion:Wells score of low potential of combining adjusted D-dimer negative is effective to exclude suspected APE patients with lung cancer.Lung cancer patients with APE often have a high level of D-dimer.
作者 王少飞 陈文丽 李金玲 杨林瀛 贾睿奕 庞桂芬 WANG Shaofei;CHEN Wenli;LI Jinling(The Affillated Hospital of Chengde Medical University,Hebei Chengde 067000,China)
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2021年第12期2023-2027,共5页 Hebei Medicine
基金 2018年度承德市科技计划自筹经费项目,(编号:201804A020)。
关键词 WELLS评分 校正的D-二聚体 肺癌 肺栓塞 Pulmonary embolisms Corrected D-dimers Lung cancer Wells score
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1WolfeTR, Allen TL. Syncope as an emergency department presenta- tion of pulmonary embolism [J]. J Emerg Med, 1998,16( 1 ):27-31.
  • 2Van Belle A, Btiller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing and computed to- mography [J]. JAMA,2006,295(2) :172-179.
  • 3Parent F, Maitre S, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic value of D-dimer in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: results from a multi- centre outcome study [ J]. Thromb Res, 2007,120 ( 2 ): 195 -200.
  • 4Gupta A, Raja AS, Ip IK, et al. Assessing 2 D-dimer age-adjust- ment strategies to optimize computed tomographic use in ED evaluation of pulmonary embolism [J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2014 , 32( 12):1499-1502.
  • 5Chagnon I, Bounameaux H, Aujesky D, et al. Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism [J]. Am J Med, 2002, 113 (4):269-275.
  • 6Gibson NS, Sohne M, Kruip M J, et al. Further validation and sim- plification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embo- lism [ J]. Thromb Haemost, 2008,99 ( 1 ) :229-234.
  • 7Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, et al. 2014 ESC guide- lines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embo- lism [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 2014,35 (43), 3033-3069.
  • 8Einstein A J, Henzlova M J, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of can- cer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed to-mography coronary angiography [J]. JAMA 2007, 298 (3):317- 323.
  • 9Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary em- bolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score [J]. Ann Intern Med,2006,144(3): 165-171.
  • 10Aydodu M, Topbai Sinanou N, Do,an NO, et al. Wells score and Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out Criteria in preventing over investigation of pulmonary embolism in emergency departments [ J ]. Tuberk Toraks, 2014,62 ( 1 ): 12-21.

共引文献44

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部