认罪认罚从宽制度中上诉不加刑原则适用问题研究——以余某平案件为例

Study on the application of the principle of appeal without penalty in the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment——Take the case of Yu Mouping as an example

从认罪认罚从宽制度与上诉不加刑原则的理论基础看,二者之间的趋同性和差异性对其如何适用产生了不容忽视的影响。二者的趋同在于价值选择、目的和功能作用三个方面;而其差异则在于整体与部分、维护利益倾向和是否涉及新诉讼模式三个方面。从个案角度看,余某平案折射出了认罪认罚从宽制度中上诉不加刑原则适用的两大困境,即刑罚轻重比较的失序和认罪认罚中“求轻”抗诉效力的缺失。由此,应当从确立刑罚轻重比较规则和确立认罪认罚从宽制度中诉权对审判权制约规则两个方面来破解困境。

Judging from the theoretical basis of the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment and the principle of appeal without penalty,the similarities and differences between the two have an impact that cannot be ignored on how they are applied.The convergence of the two lies in the three aspects of value selection,purpose and function;while the difference lies in the three aspects of the whole and the part,the tendency to maintain interests,and whether the new litigation mode is involved.From a case-by-case perspective,the Yu X Ping case reflects two major dilemmas in the application of the principle of appeal without penalty in the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment,namely,the disorder of the comparison of the severity of the penalties and the lack of effectiveness of lodging an appeal“for leniency”in pleading guilty and accepting punishment.Therefore,it is necessary to solve the dilemma from two aspects:the establishment of the rules for the comparison of the severity of the penalties and the establishment of the rules that restrict the power of prosecution to the judicial power in the leniency system for pleading guilty and accepting punishment.