期刊文献+

产业特征对技术创新激励政策效应的交互影响 被引量:8

Interactive influence of industrial characteristics on the effect of technological innovation incentive policies
原文传递
导出
摘要 有关技术创新激励政策效应的研究对产业特征的关注还不充分,影响了对激励政策产业层面效应的深入理解。本文认为更为系统地重审技术创新激励政策的效应,有必要将产业市场竞争度与产业技术吸收能力同步纳入研究模型,因为它们分别影响产业创新主体的技术创新动机和技术创新能力。当产业市场竞争度与产业技术吸收能力都处于高水平时,技术创新激励政策对产业技术创新的正向效应最为明显。实证数据来自和五类使能技术的应用密切相关的16个制造业的2013—2017年的数据,包括R&D资本存量、全时人员当量、发明专利申请数、新产品开发项目数、新产品销售收入数据,和以DEA视窗方法计算得到的产业技术创新绩效数据,分析结果表明:产业技术吸收能力放大了税收优惠政策对技术创新绩效的正向作用;但是R&D补贴政策对于技术吸收能力低的产业有更高的正向效应;当技术市场竞争度高时,技术吸收力对税收优惠与R&D补贴的正向促进作用最高。本研究深化了对技术创新激励政策的作用机理的理解,并提示政策制定者需要充分重视产业的市场竞争度。 Whether incentive policies of technological innovation affect technological innovation performance no longer seems to be the focus of discussion, but the mechanism by which policy works remains controversial. This paper argues that it is necessary to revisit this issue from the perspective of industrial characteristics by introducing industrial technology absorptive capacity and market competition degrees. Taking the enabling technologies(ETs) related manufacture industries as the object of study is of great significance to the enhancement of technological competitiveness and industrial upgrading. ETs are pre-competitive technologies that promote the innovation of other scientific and technological achievements. In recent years, developed countries laid stress on the development of enabling technologies and listed them as strategic development areas. In 2010, China identified the national emerging sectors of strategic importance, of which enabling technologies are the core and key part. Thus, study the incentive policies of technological innovation on the ET related manufacture industries is significant for Chinese manufacture industries′ technology upgrading and industrial competitiveness. As innovation policies are formulated for industries or sectors rather than firms, this paper′s theoretical model not only helps policy makers to tailor policies to industry characteristics, but also to adjust policy tightness according to industrial conditions. Government innovation incentives are exogenous forces for industrial technological innovation. To study the effect of incentive policies of technological innovation on industrial technological innovation. The characteristics of industries should be considered, due to that the technological absorptive capacity of the industry matters with the industry′s ability of technology innovation. Meanwhile, the competitiveness of the industrial market relates with the industry′s motivation to do technology innovation. Thus, take the two characteristics of industries into the effect model of will give us more comprehensive picture of the effect of incentive policies of technological innovation on industrial technological innovation.There are two types of innovation incentives widely used in China: direct incentives and indirect incentives. We chose the most used government R&D subsidies to represent direct incentive policy and tax incentives to represent indirect incentives. The sample industries of the empirical study are 16 ET-enabling industries. We first measure the technological innovation performance of each industry using a window DEA model, and in the descriptive statistics section provide a longitudinal comparative analysis of the technological innovation efficiency values of each enabling technology sector. Then, after verifying the external incentive effects of innovation policies, we investigate the triple interaction effects of technology absorptive capacity, market competitiveness and innovation policies. The regression results show that the incentive effect of tax incentives is better than that of R&D subsidies, and the technology absorptive capacity is also more facilitative to tax incentives. Finally, the triple interaction term shows a significant effect, with high market competition being conducive to stimulating the moderating effect of technology absorptive capacity on tax incentives and improving the technological innovation performance of industries.This paper′s academic contribution is threefold. Firstly, most of the existing domestic studies take enterprises as the perspective for interpreting the effects of policies, lacking attention to the industry level. The paper uses industry data to target the effects of policies on enabling technology related industries, which is more conducive to observing the effects of existing innovation policies and making recommendations with practical guidance. Secondly, the paper does not limit itself to discussing whether innovation policies have influenced technological innovation but examines in depth the mechanism of their effects after verifying their incentive effects. The paper looks at the incentive effects of policies by taking industrial motivation and ability into consideration, and found the three-way interactive effect of incentive policies of technological innovation on industrial technological innovation performance. Finally, in terms of the measurement of innovation performance, the paper extends the scope of innovation performance to technological innovation, and instead of using a single indicator to simply measure technological innovation performance, a data envelopment approach is used to measure the efficiency of each unit in a comprehensive manner using both input and output variables. Instead of using a single indicator to simply measure technological innovation performance, a data envelope approach is used to measure the efficiency of each unit using a combination of input and output variables.Based on the findings of this paper, the following recommendations are made: firstly, policy makers should pay attention to the degree of market competition in the target industry in order to take full value of incentive policies of technological innovation. Secondly, tax incentives are better for R&D subsidies in fostering industrial technological innovation.
作者 蒋洁 汤超颖 张启航 冯俊文 Jiang Jie;Tang Chaoying;Zhang Qihang;Feng Junwen(School of Intellectual Property,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210014,Jiangsu,China;School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210014,Jiangsu,China)
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第11期71-81,共11页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目:“高层次科技人才流入与研发团队创造力的关联研究”(71974178,2020.01—2023.12) 国家自然科学基金重点项目:“高新技术产业突破性创新的形成机制与模式研究”(71932009,2020.01—2023.12) 国家自然科学基金重点项目:“国家区域发展战略下的创新生态系统发展理论与政策研究”(72034002,2021.01—2025.12)。
关键词 税收优惠 R&D补贴 产业技术创新绩效 技术吸收能力 产业市场竞争度 tax incentive R&D subsidy industrial technological innovation performance technological absorptive capacity industrial market competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献422

共引文献4121

同被引文献136

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部