哈贝马斯论证思想研究

A Study of Habermas’ Argumentative Thought

论证作为哈贝马斯形式语用学的重要组成部分,是兑现命题的真实性、规范的正确性和表达的真诚性等有效性主张的理性方式。通过拓宽可批判检验的有效性范围、确定有效性的客观性、参照亚里士多德经典分类学科等三个层面,可以看出克莱因和图尔敏等诸多学者论证理论对哈贝马斯论证思想有很大贡献。哈贝马斯的论证思想与交往合理性紧密相连,理性重建旨在通过论证和理性判断来实现交往行为合理化。要进一步发展哈贝马斯的论证思想,语用论辩理论是一条可供选择的路径。

Argumentation, as an important part of Habermas’ formal pragmatics, is a rational way to cash in on validity claims such as the truth of propositions, correctness of norms, and sincerity of expression. By broadening the scope of critically testable validity, determining the objectivity of validity, and referring to the classical Aristotelian discipline of classification, it can be seen that many scholars such as Klein and Toulmin’s argumentation theory have contributed greatly to Habermas’ argumentative thought. Habermas’ argumentative thought is closely linked to the rationality of interaction, and the reconstruction of rationality aims to rationalize the act of interaction through argument and rational judgment. The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation is an alternative path to further develop Habermas’ argumentative thought.