摘要
庭审记录电子化改革是推进诉讼程序繁简分流的重要举措之一,其核心建立在当事人自愿的前提下,于简易程序案件中以庭审录音录像或智能转化文字替代书记员制作的庭审笔录。目前,庭审记录改革呈现出理论与实践的冲突,在体现其预设功能的同时也面临着立法规范模糊、实际操作困境、电子信息安全保障等现实问题。由于庭审笔录性质模糊与改革方向单一性的双重原因,庭审笔录改革陷入既无法进行根本变革,又无法实现技术普适的困局。解决上述问题应在确立庭审笔录法定化基础上完善庭审录音录像适用规范、设立改革配套措施,并提高电子庭审记录系统的技术水平。
The electronic court trialrecords reform is one of the important measures to promote the complicated and simplified streams of litigation procedures,the core of which is established on the premise of the voluntary nature of the concerning parties.In the trials of summary cases,the records in audio and video forms or intelligent conversion of verbal textstake the place of the trial transcript produced by the clerks.At present,the trial transcript reform presents a conflict between theory and practice.While reflecting its predetermined function,it also faces real problems such as ambiguous legislative regulation,practical difficultiesand guarantee of electronic information security.Due to the dual reasons for the ambiguity of the nature of the trial transcript and the unity of the reform direction,trial transcript reform falls into the dilemma in which not only fundamental changes can not be made,but also technical universality can not be achieved.To solve the above problems,trial transcript reformshould,based on the establishment of legalization of trial transcripts,improve the application normof audio and videotrialrecording,establish supporting measures for the reformand improve the technical level of electronic trial recording system.
作者
梁钰蕾
王晓华
Liang Yulei;Wang Xiaohua(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出处
《梧州学院学报》
2021年第4期25-31,共7页
Journal of Wuzhou University
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(20&ZD191)。
关键词
庭审记录电子化
庭审记录改革
智慧司法
庭审笔录法定化
Electronic court trial record
Trial record reform
Intelligent justice
Legalization of court transcript