摘要
斯特拉霍夫与陀思妥耶夫斯基曾是关系较为密切的思想同道,前者对《罪与罚》的评论得到了作家的高度评价。但在此后的交往中,由于批评家与作家在真实与幻想问题上的内在分歧,他们对《白痴》的看法产生了重大分歧。这种矛盾一直延续到了斯特拉霍夫对作家身后的盖棺论定。评论家与作家的分歧不仅在于政治观,更涉及文学观的差异。
N.N.Strakhov and F.M.Dostoevsky are close ideological fellows,and the former’s comment on Crime and Punishment has been highly praised by the writer.However,in the subsequent exchanges of ideas,the critics and writers have their own views on Idiot due to the inherent differences between the truth and fantasy.This disagreement continued until Strahov’s conclusion on the writer’s creation.Their differences are not only in political,but also in literary views.
出处
《中国俄语教学》
CSSCI
2021年第4期1-8,共8页
Russian in China
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“《俄国导报》研究(1856-1906)”(20AWW004)的阶段性成果。