期刊文献+

剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室不同手术方法的临床治疗效果观察 被引量:3

Observation of clinical treatment efficacy of different surgical methods for uterine scar diverticulum cesarean postoperation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨宫腔镜辅助下经阴道剖宫产子宫瘢痕憩室切除修补术及宫腔镜子宫瘢痕憩室电切术对于CSD的疗效和临床价值。方法对2014年1月-2018年1月我院就诊的73例CSD患者,分别行2种手术,评价治疗效果。结果随访6个月,73例患者中,阴式手术30例,术后随访29例,失联1例。宫腔镜电切术43例,43例患者术后随访38例,失联5例。结论CSD患者的治疗,根据B超具体情况及患者生育要求,选择相应的手术方式达到预期的治疗效果。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and clinical value of hysteroscopy-assisted transvaginal scar diverticulectomy and hysteroscopic scar diverticulectomy for uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section.Methods A total of 73 patients with CSD for the treatment in our hospital from Jan.2014 to Jan.2018,who were accepted two kinds surgeries.It evaluated the treatment effects of the two surgical methods.Results Follow-up time was 6 months,among 73 patients,30 cases were vaginal operation,and 29 cases were recieved post-operation follow-up,of which 1 case was lost of communication.43 patients underwent hysteroscopic electrocision,38 cases of 43 patients were followed up postoperatively,and 5 cases were lost of communication.Conclusions In the treatment of patients with CSD,the corresponding surgical method should be selected according to the B-ultrasound and the patient's fertility requirements to achieve the expected therapeutic effects.
作者 李继英 李寅 胡红文 沈欢欢 LI Ji-ying;LI Yin;HU Hong-wen;SHENG Huan-huan(Department of Gynecology,The Third People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province,Kunming Yunnan 650011,China)
出处 《云南医药》 2021年第6期514-517,共4页 Medicine and Pharmacy of Yunnan
基金 云南省应用基础研究计划项目(201701YH00045)。
关键词 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕憩室 宫腔镜 阴式手术 uterine scar diverticulum after cesarean section hysteroscopy vaginal surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献89

  • 1邓娅莉,丁依玲,范雪梅.剖宫产术后子宫切口愈合不良56例临床分析[J].实用预防医学,2006,13(2):388-389. 被引量:44
  • 2许川一.剖宫产切口愈合不良伴月经不调的超声和临床分析[J].浙江临床医学,2006,8(8):812-812. 被引量:9
  • 3Mac Dorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes[ J]. Clin Perinatol,2008,35 (2) :293 - 307.
  • 4Pisake L, Malinee L, Metin Giilmezoglu A, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007 - 2008 [ J ]. Lancet, 2010,375 (9713) : 490 - 499.
  • 5Dulitzki Mordechai MD, Soriano David MD, Schiff Eyal MD, et al. Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery [ J ]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998,92 ( 6 ) : 935 - 939.
  • 6Le Ray Camille MD, Serres Pauline, Schmitz Thomas MD, et al. PhD manual rotation in occiput posterior or transverse positions: risk factors and consequences on the cesarean delivery rate [ J ]. Obstetrics & Gynecology,2007,110 (g) :873 - 879.
  • 7Zhang Jun PhD, Liu Yinghui MD, Meikle Susan,et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast china[ J]. Obstetrics & Gynecology ,2008, 111 (5) : 1077 - 1082.
  • 8Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 54(1): 90-97.
  • 9Ecker JL, Frigoletto FD Jr. Cesarean delivery and the risk-benefit calculus[J]. N Engl J Med,2007, 356: 885-888.
  • 10Liang F, He J. Methotrexate-based bilateral uterine arterial chemoembolization for treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Seand, 2010, 89(12) : 1592-1524.

共引文献382

同被引文献39

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部