期刊文献+

台湾地区政党轮替影响经济表现的传导机制——基于投资风险引致视角的经验考察

The Transmission Mechanism of Political Party Rotation Affecting Economic Performance in Taiwan:An Empirical Investigation Base on the Perspective of Investment Risk
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2000年以来,台湾地区已完成三次政党轮替,而经济形势却未随之有所改善。研究发现:国民党与民进党在台湾轮流执政,施政重心均从经济发展转为政治斗争,政治凌驾于经济之上;行政首长频繁更换、立法机构掣肘行政部门、酬庸性质的人事任命,大大降低了行政效率,严重拖累公共政策的推行;财经政策急功近利、摇摆不定,重创当局信誉,削弱了台湾的投资吸引力;基于胜选考量大开政策福利支票、因应两岸紧张局势增加防务特别预算,从而大量挤占经济发展资源;动荡乃至恶化的两岸关系增加了侨外投资的政治风险,加大了台湾参与区域经济整合的难度,减少了台湾分享大陆经济发展红利的机会。研究认为,台湾地区三次政党轮替升高了国、民两党冲突,从“政治化”经济问题、放大政治体制弊端、增加财经政策不确定性、扭曲财税预算分配、加剧台海动荡等方面破坏了岛内投资环境,推高了岛内投资成本,从而使台湾经济陷入低投资、低增长困境。 Taiwan has achieved three political party rotations since 2000,but its economic situation has not improved.The study found that as the KMT and DPP have taken turns in power in Taiwan,the focus of the governance has shifted from economic development to political struggle,with politics taking precedence over economics,and the frequent change of the chief executive,the legislative constraints on the executive bodies and the appointment of personnel with a rewarding character have greatly reduced the administrative efficiency and seriously slowed down the implementation of public policies.On the other hand,seeking quick success and instant benefits and wavering in financial and economic policies have seriously damaged the government's credibility and weakened Taiwan's investment attraction.The policy welfare checks issued on the basis of election considerations and the special budget for“national defense”in response to the increase in the crossStrait tensions have greatly squeezed the resources of economic development.Moreover,the turbulent and even deteriorating cross-Strait relations have increased the political risks of foreign investment in Taiwan,making it more difficult for Taiwan to participate in regional economic integration,and reducing Taiwan's opportunity to share in the dividends of economic development in the mainland.The study concludes that the three times'political party rotations in Taiwan have aggravated the conflict between the KMT and DPP,and in terms of the high“politicization”of its economic issues,the magnification of the disadvantages of the constitutional system,the increase of the uncertainty of the financial and economic policies,the distortion of the allocation of the financial budget,and the intensification of the instability of the cross-strait relations,they have damaged the investment environment and pushed up the investment cost on the island,thus plunging Taiwan economy into a predicament of low investment and low growth.
作者 黄燕萍 卢晓芳 秦伟腾 Huang Yanping;Lu Xiaofang;Qin Weiteng
出处 《台湾研究集刊》 CSSCI 2021年第6期47-56,共10页 Taiwan Research Journal
基金 2020年度国家社科基金一般项目“台湾政治变迁影响经济增长的传导机制研究”(20BJL012)。
关键词 台湾地区 政党轮替 经济表现 影响机制 Taiwan rotation of political parties economic performance influencing mechanism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献61

  • 1许南雄.台湾人事主管机关的体制形态[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),1993,10(3):41-41. 被引量:1
  • 2李鹏.“修宪”、“制宪”、“行宪”之争与台湾“宪政秩序”塑造中的“国家认同”[J].台湾研究集刊,2006(3):8-15. 被引量:6
  • 3《北京过半重大涉税案件涉及房地产》,北京市市地税局副局长郝硕博在通报2006年北京地税税务稽查工作情况时所言.中国评论新闻网.http://www.chinareviewnews.com,2007年4月27日.
  • 4詹姆斯·麦格雷戈·伯恩斯,J.W.佩尔塔森等.民治政府--美国政府与政治(第二十版)[M].吴爱民,李亚梅等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.175.
  • 5Republican Party Platform of 1984 [ EB/OL ].http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25845,2009-09-20.
  • 6Republican Party Platform of 1956 [ EB/OL ].http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25838,2009-09-20.
  • 7Democratic Party Platform of 1960 [ EB/OL].http ://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29602,2009-09-20.
  • 8Maurice R. Berube. American Presidents and Education. Greenwood Press, 1991.33.
  • 9Wayne J.Urban, Jennings LWagoner, Jr..American Education: A History(second edition).McGraw-Hill Companies, 2000. 311,366.
  • 10Michael Engel. The Struggle for Control of Public Education : Market Ideology vs. Democratic Values.Temple University Press, 2000.8.

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部