获得国家奖学金医学研究生创新能力的分析

Analysis on the innovative ability of medical postgraduate students who won the national scholarship

目的分析获得国家奖学金(以下简称"国奖")医学研究生的创新能力,探讨临床医学研究生创新能力的培养及相关因素。方法以四川大学华西临床医学院临床医学专业2016、2017级在读研究生为调查对象,以是否获得国奖分为国奖组与对照组,比较两组研究生的创新能力水平和认知差异,并探讨相关因素。结果共回收有效问卷1 173份,回收率80.23%。两组研究生的性别和专业差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对于硕士研究生,国奖组发表国际医学期刊论文(80.95%vs. 29.63%)、发表高影响因子期刊论文(影响因子≥6)(7.84%vs.6.16%)、研究申请专利(12.70%vs. 3.51%)和创新创业竞赛获奖(20.63%vs. 3.93%)的比例高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于博士研究生,国奖组发表国际医学期刊论文(96.00%vs. 69.66%)、发表高影响因子期刊论文(22.22%vs. 8.89%)、研究申请专利(17.33%vs. 8.36%)和创新创业竞赛获奖(17.33%vs. 1.86%)的比例高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于创新能力构成的认知,国奖组与对照组的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。国奖组与对照组均有超过40%的研究生认为创新能力个人影响因素中最重要的是知识因素,有超过45%的研究生认为创新能力培养影响因素中最重要的是自身因素或导师因素。结论临床医学研究生创新能力有待提升,导师科研能力水平、导师指导、高质量科研团队、良好学术氛围对于创新能力的培养具有重要作用。优化导师队伍、组建科研指导小组、构建高水平创新平台、瞄准孵化高水平论文、强化国内外交流与合作、激励学生参加创新创业竞赛是培养创新型医学人才的有力举措。

Objective To analyze the innovative ability of medical postgraduate students who have won national scholarships, and discuss the cultivation of innovative ability of clinical medicine postgraduate students and related factors. Methods A survey was based on the 2016 and 2017 postgraduate students majoring in clinical medicine at West China School of Medicine of Sichuan University. According to whether they had won a national scholarship, they were divided into a national scholarship group and a control group. The innovation ability and cognitive differences of the two groups of postgraduate students were compared, and related factors were explored. Results A total of 1 173 valid questionnaires were responsed, with a response rate of 80.23%. There was no statistically significant difference in gender and major between the two groups of postgraduate students(P>0.05). For master’s degree postgraduate students, the proportion of published papers in international medical journals(80.95% vs. 29.63%), published high impact factor(impact factor≥6) journal papers(7.84% vs. 6.16%), applied for research patents(12.70% vs. 3.51%) and innovation and entrepreneurship competition awards(20.63% vs. 3.93%) in the national scholarship group were higher than the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). For doctor’s degree postgraduate students, the proportion of published papers in international medical journals(96.00% vs. 69.66%), published high impact factor journal papers(22.22% vs. 8.89%), applied for research patents(17.33% vs. 8.36%), and innovation and entrepreneurship competition awards(17.33% vs. 1.86%) in the national scholarship group were higher than the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Regarding the cognition of the composition of innovation ability, the differences between the national scholarship group and the control group were not statistically significant(P>0.05). Regardless of master’s degree or doctor’s degree, more than 40% of the postgraduate students in the national scholarship group and the control group believed that the most important factor in the personal influence of innovation ability was the knowledge factor, and more than 45% of the postgraduate students believed that the most important factors affecting the cultivation of innovative ability was their own factors or tutors’ factors. Conclusions The innovative ability of clinical medicine postgraduate students needs to be improved. The level of tutors’ scientific research ability, tutors’ guidance,high-quality scientific research team, and a good academic atmosphere play an important role in the cultivation of innovation ability. Optimizing the team of tutors, forming a scientific research steering group, building a high-level innovation platform, aiming at publishing high-level papers, strengthening domestic and foreign exchanges and cooperation, and motivating students to participate in innovation and entrepreneurship competitions are powerful measures to cultivate innovative medical talents.