期刊文献+

Formation blockage risk analysis of geothermal water reinjection:Rock property analysis,pumping and reinjection tests,and long-term reinjection prediction 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 The blockage induced by particle migration and deposition is one of the main reasons for the decrease of reinjection capacity in the porous geothermal reservoir with a low and medium temperature.In this paper,a new drilled geothermal well in Xining basin China is taken as an example to investigate the formation blockage risk due to the movable clay and sand particles in pores.The physical properties of the reservoir rocks were analyzed,a series of pumping and reinjection tests were conducted,and the longterm reinjection performance of the well was predicted by numerical simulation based on the test fitting.The results show that the geothermal reservoir rocks are argillaceous and weakly cemented sandstones with a content of movable clay and sand particles up to 0.18–23.42 wt.%.The well presented a high productivity of 935–2186 m3?d-1 at a pressure difference of 0.7–1.62 MPa in the pumping tests associated with a large amount of clay and sand particles produced out,while in the reinjection test,only a low injectivity of 240–480 m3?d-1 was observed at an injection pressure of 0.2–0.6 MPa with the clay and sand particles near the wellbore move into deep.According to the prediction,under conditions of a blockage risk,the injectivity of the well will start to decline after 100 days of injection,and in the third year,it will decrease by 59.00%–77.09%.The influence of invasion of pretreated suspended particles and scale particles can be neglected.Under conditions of a high blockage risk,the injectivity of the well will decrease significantly in the first 20–30 days,with a decline of 75.39%–78.96%.Generally,the higher the injection pressure or rate,the greater the decrease in injectivity of the well caused by particle blockage.Pump lifting is an effective measure to remove the well blockage which can be used regularly.
出处 《Geoscience Frontiers》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2022年第1期310-325,共16页 地学前缘(英文版)
基金 supported by the Basic Research Program Project of Qinghai Province(No.2020-ZJ-758) the Special Fund on the Exploration of Clean Energy and Mineral Products in Qinghai Province(20181317146sh 007) partially financed by the General Project of Shandong Natural Science Foundation(ZR2020ME090)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献71

  • 1刘允芳,刘元坤.单钻孔中水压致裂法三维地应力测量的新进展[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(z2):3816-3822. 被引量:18
  • 2董长银,李长印,扈福堂,冯胜利,武龙.油气井防砂效果评价方法体系的研究及应用[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(1):103-106. 被引量:11
  • 3杜新强,廖资生,李砚阁.含水层储存和回采技术的研究与应用[J].中国给水排水,2004,20(8):24-26. 被引量:20
  • 4尤明庆.水压致裂法测量地应力方法的研究[J].岩土工程学报,2005,27(3):350-353. 被引量:54
  • 5瓦尔特H费特尔 宋秀珍 译.异常地层压力[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1982..
  • 6李方全,王连捷.华北地区现今构造应力场[M].北京:地质出版社,1981:142-150.
  • 7天津第一地质勘探大队,南开大学数学系.天津市第三系第Ⅲ组多井回灌开采系统下水动力场、水质场、温度场变化的数值模拟研究[R].天津:天津第一地质勘探大队,1988.
  • 8天津市塘沽区供热办公室,天津地热勘查开发设计院.天津市塘沽区回灌试验研究报告[R].天津:天津地热勘查开发设计院,1996.
  • 9武汉地质学院岩相组,大港油田研究院岩相组.黄骅坳陷第三系沉积相及沉积环境[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
  • 10Herman B. Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering [J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002,10(1)..121-142.

共引文献86

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部