期刊文献+

“双减”背景下加强形成性评价的思考 被引量:27

Enhancing Formative Assessment under the Background of the Double-reduction Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “双减”政策的提出不仅是为了减少学生过多的学习任务“量”,而且要增强学习的“质”,促进学生的全面发展。为实现“双减”政策的目标,要发挥形成性评价诊断学情、教情和改进教学的功能。加强形成性评价实践的措施有:1)设计多种形式的评价任务,尤其是适当增加表现性评价任务;2)充分使用评价信息改进教学,给学生提供优质反馈;3)引导学生进行形成性自评,促进自主学习能力的发展。 The double-reduction policy aims not only to reduce the workload of students,but also to increase the quality of learning and facilitate all-round development of students.To achieve the goals of the double reduction policy,one important aspect in educational assessment reform in China is to enhance formative assessment,emphasizing the role of school assessment in identifying the level of student learning and improving the quality of teaching and learning.The measures to strengthen the practice of formative assessment are:1)designing multiple forms of assessment tasks to facilitate holistic development of students,especially performance assessment tasks;2)making full use of assessment information to improve teaching and providing quality feedback to students;3)guiding students to conduct formative self-assessment to facilitate the development of self-regulated learning.
作者 骆文淑 杨志明 LUO Wenshu;YANG Zhiming(Foshan University,Foshan 528225,China;Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
出处 《中国考试》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期63-68,共6页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 “双减”政策 教育评价改革 形成性评价 表现性评价 形成性自评 double-reduction policy educational assessment reform formative assessment performance assessment formative self-assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献18

  • 1Stiggins R J. Design and development of performance assessment.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1986, Vol(6), 32- 42.
  • 2Haertel E H. Performance Assessment And Education Reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 1999, Vol ( 11 ), 517 - 523.
  • 3Brenda S. A theory-based framework for assessing domain-specific problem-solving ability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1995, Vol (14), 29 - 35.
  • 4Brookhart M B, Durkin D T. Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 2003,Vol ( 16), 27 - 54.
  • 5Fuchs L S, Fuchs D, Karns K, et al. Mathematics performance assessment in the classroom: effects on teacher planning and student problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 1999, Vol (36), 609- 646.
  • 6National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Virginia: NCTM, 1959,70- 71.
  • 7Glaser R. Expert knowledge and processes of thinking. In D. F. Halpern(Ed. ), Enhancing thinking skills in the sciences and mathematic, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1992, 63 - 75.
  • 8Taylor K L, Dionne F. Accessing problem-solving strategy knowledge: the complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000, Vol (92), 413 - 425.
  • 9Lester F K. Musing about mathematical problem-solving research: 1970- 1994. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1994, Vo1(25), 660 - 675.
  • 10Bottge B A. Reconceptualizing mathematics problem solving for low achievement students. Remedial & Special education, 2001, Vo1(22), 102 - 122.

共引文献48

引证文献27

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部