摘要
目的:探讨内隐公正世界信念对第三方惩罚的影响。方法:通过内隐联想测验筛选出高、低内隐公正世界信念被试,采用2(内隐公正世界信念:高、低)×5(提议公正性:90:10、80:20、70:30、60:40、50:50)两因素混合实验设计,其中,内隐公正世界信念为被试间变量,提议公正性为被试内变量,因变量为被试自愿拿出的惩罚金额。结果:(1)内隐公正世界信念影响第三方惩罚,相比低内隐公正世界信念个体,高内隐公正世界信念个体第三方惩罚更多;(2)提议公正性影响第三方惩罚,提议越不公正,第三方惩罚越多;(3)内隐公正世界信念与提议公正性之间交互作用不显著。结论:高内隐公正信念个体的第三方惩罚多于低内隐公正世界信念个体,且都随着提议不公正性的提高而增加。
Objective: To investigate the influence of belief in a just world on the third-party punishment. Methods: Individuals with high and low implicit belief in a just world were classified through the implicit association test. The 2(implicit belief in a just world: high and low) ×5(proposed fairness: 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50) two factors mixed experimental design was adopted, among which the implicit belief in a just world was between-subject variable, the proposed fairness was internal variable, and the amount of penalty offered voluntarily was the dependent variable. Results:(1)the implicit belief in a just world affected the third party punishment. Compared with individuals with low implicit belief in a just world, individuals with high implicit belief in a just world had more third-party punishment.(2)the proposed fairness affectd the third-party punishment. The more unfair the proposal, the more the third-party punishment.(3)there was no significant interaction between the implicit justice world belief and the proposed justice. Conclusion: The third-party punishment of individuals with high implicit justice belief was more than that of individuals with low implicit justice belief, and both increased with the proposed unfairness.
作者
冯杰
员秀
贺雯
丁炜
FENG Jie;YUN Xiu;HE Wen;DING Wei(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China;Shanghai MinhangZhuan Qiao Middle School,Shanghai 201100,China)
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2021年第6期1151-1154,1150,共5页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“医患关系的影响机制和干预策略研究”(项目编号:17BSH093),。
关键词
内隐公正世界信念
提议公正性
第三方惩罚
Implicit justice world beliefs
Proposed fairness
Third-party punishment