期刊文献+

内隐公正世界信念对第三方惩罚的影响 被引量:1

The Impact of Implicit Justice World Beliefs on Third-party Punishment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨内隐公正世界信念对第三方惩罚的影响。方法:通过内隐联想测验筛选出高、低内隐公正世界信念被试,采用2(内隐公正世界信念:高、低)×5(提议公正性:90:10、80:20、70:30、60:40、50:50)两因素混合实验设计,其中,内隐公正世界信念为被试间变量,提议公正性为被试内变量,因变量为被试自愿拿出的惩罚金额。结果:(1)内隐公正世界信念影响第三方惩罚,相比低内隐公正世界信念个体,高内隐公正世界信念个体第三方惩罚更多;(2)提议公正性影响第三方惩罚,提议越不公正,第三方惩罚越多;(3)内隐公正世界信念与提议公正性之间交互作用不显著。结论:高内隐公正信念个体的第三方惩罚多于低内隐公正世界信念个体,且都随着提议不公正性的提高而增加。 Objective: To investigate the influence of belief in a just world on the third-party punishment. Methods: Individuals with high and low implicit belief in a just world were classified through the implicit association test. The 2(implicit belief in a just world: high and low) ×5(proposed fairness: 90:10, 80:20, 70:30, 60:40, 50:50) two factors mixed experimental design was adopted, among which the implicit belief in a just world was between-subject variable, the proposed fairness was internal variable, and the amount of penalty offered voluntarily was the dependent variable. Results:(1)the implicit belief in a just world affected the third party punishment. Compared with individuals with low implicit belief in a just world, individuals with high implicit belief in a just world had more third-party punishment.(2)the proposed fairness affectd the third-party punishment. The more unfair the proposal, the more the third-party punishment.(3)there was no significant interaction between the implicit justice world belief and the proposed justice. Conclusion: The third-party punishment of individuals with high implicit justice belief was more than that of individuals with low implicit justice belief, and both increased with the proposed unfairness.
作者 冯杰 员秀 贺雯 丁炜 FENG Jie;YUN Xiu;HE Wen;DING Wei(College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China;Shanghai MinhangZhuan Qiao Middle School,Shanghai 201100,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期1151-1154,1150,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目“医患关系的影响机制和干预策略研究”(项目编号:17BSH093),。
关键词 内隐公正世界信念 提议公正性 第三方惩罚 Implicit justice world beliefs Proposed fairness Third-party punishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献75

  • 1池丽萍,辛自强.幸福感:认知与情感成分的不同影响因素[J].心理发展与教育,2002,18(2):27-32. 被引量:161
  • 2师保国,申继亮.家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(1):30-34. 被引量:190
  • 3杜建政,祝振兵,李兴琨.大学生公正世界信念量表的初步编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(3):239-241. 被引量:55
  • 4杨福义,梁宁建.内隐自尊与外显自尊的关系:多重内隐测量的视角[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):785-790. 被引量:41
  • 5[1]Greenwald A G, McGhee E, Schwartz J L K. Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(5): 181~198
  • 6[2]Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit Social Cognition. Attitudes, Self-Esteem and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1): 4~27
  • 7[3]Farnham S D, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit self-esteem. In: Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A ed. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Blackwell Publishers Inc, 1999. 230~248
  • 8[4]Greenwald A G, Klinger M R, Liu T J. Unoconcious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory and cognition, 1989,17: 35~47
  • 9[5]Murphy S T, Zajoc R B. Affect ,cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 64: 723~739
  • 10[6]Dasgupta N, McGhee D E, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36: 316~328

共引文献273

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部