期刊文献+

恩替卡韦和拉夫米定治疗乙肝的临床效果对比 被引量:1

Comparison of Clinical Effects of Entecavir and Lavumidine in the Treatment of Hepatitis B
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨恩替卡韦和拉夫米定治疗乙肝的临床效果。方法将该院2018年2月—2019年10月期间收治的104例乙肝患者随机分为两组,其中给予对照组拉夫米定治疗,而观察组则运用恩替卡韦治疗,对两组患者的治疗效果进行比较分析。结果治疗前,两组血清HBsAg定量水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后12周,两组的HBsAg水平均下降,但是组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后24周、48周,观察组的血清HBsAg水平明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的HBV DNA转阴率和HBsAg定量<2500 IU/mL百分比分别为75.00%、25.00%,而对照组则为53.85%、5.77%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.076、7.386,P<0.05);同时,观察组的ALT、HBeAg以及HBV DNA水平分别为(70.2±10.3)U/L、(77.4±20.5)COI、(8.5±2.1)×10^(5) IU/mL,而对照组则为(83.4±9.5)U/L、(89.2±21.3)COI、(9.8±1.7)×10^(5) IU/mL,组间比较差异有统计学意义(t=6.793、2.878、3.470,P<0.05)。结论在乙肝患者的临床治疗中,与拉夫米定相比,恩替卡韦不仅可以降低血清HBsAg水平,还能提高HBV DNA转阴率,获得较好的治疗效果,有助于改善患者预后,具有一定的推广运用价值。 Objective To explore the clinical effects of entecavir and lafmididine in the treatment of hepatitis B.Methods The 104 hepatitis B patients admitted to the hospital from February 2018 to October 2019 were randomly divided into two groups.Among them,the control group was treated with lavmidine and the observation group was treated with entecavir.The treatment effects of the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed.Results Before treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the quantitative level of serum HBsAg between the two groups(P>0.05);12 weeks after treatment,the HBsAg level of the two groups decreased,but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05);After 24 weeks and 48 weeks,the serum HBsAg level of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05);the HBV DNA conversion rate and the percentage of HBsAg quantitative<2500 IU/mL in the observation group were 75.00%,respectively 25.00%,while the control group were 53.85%,5.77%,the difference was statistically significant(χ^(2)=5.076,7.386,P<0.05);at the same time,the observation group's ALT,HBeAg and HBV DNA levels were(70.2±10.3)U/L,(77.4±20.5)COI,(8.5±2.1)×10^(5) IU/mL,while the control group were(83.4±9.5)U/L,(89.2±21.3)COI,(9.8±1.7)×10^(5) IU/mL,the difference between the groups was statistically significant(t=6.793,2.878,3.470,P<0.05).Conclusion In the clinical treatment of hepatitis B patients,entecavir can not only reduce the serum HBsAg level,but also increase the rate of HBV DNA conversion to obtain better therapeutic effects compared with lavmidine.It is helpful to improve the prognosis of patients,and has certain promotion and application value.
作者 褚慧彬 高庆娥 CHU Huibin;GAO Qinge(Four Department of infection,Fourth People's Hospital,Zibo,Shandong Province,255067 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2021年第22期65-68,共4页 Systems Medicine
基金 2019年度山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(2019WS298)。
关键词 乙肝 恩替卡韦 HBSAG定量 拉夫米定 Hepatitis B Entecavir HBsAg quantitative Lamivudine
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献134

  • 1林晓玮,于水莲.恩替卡韦联合前列地尔对乙肝肝硬化腹水的临床疗效分析[J].中国农村卫生,2018,0(16):27-28. 被引量:1
  • 2孙妩弋,魏伟.中药和天然药物治疗肝纤维化的研究[J].中国药理学通报,2004,20(7):741-745. 被引量:22
  • 3刘卫平,王贵强.乙型肝炎病毒相关性肾炎研究进展[J].国外医学(流行病学.传染病学分册),2005,32(6):356-358. 被引量:8
  • 4杨清,龚作炯,胡丹凤.阿德福韦酯和拉米夫定治疗乙型肝炎肝硬化失代偿期的临床观察[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2007,15(11):821-824. 被引量:33
  • 5Fact sheets: hepatitis B. World Health Organization. Updated March2015. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs204/en/.
  • 6Pawlotsky JM, Dusheiko G, Hatzakis A, et al. Virologic monitoring of hepatitis B virus therapy in clinical trials and practice: recommendations for a standardized approach. Gastroenterology, 2008, 134(2): 405-415.
  • 7Westland CE, Yang H, Delaney WE, et al. Activity of adefovir dipivoxil against all patterns of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B viruses in patients. J Viral Hepat, 2005, 12(1): 67-73.
  • 8Yuen MF, Fung l, Wong DKH, et al. Prevention and management of drug resistance for antihepatitis B treatment. Lancet Infect Dis, 2009, 9(4): 256-264.
  • 9Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5,1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration,2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 10Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metananlysis. Eur ] Epidemiol, 2010, 25(9): 603-605.

共引文献310

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部