期刊文献+

改良填料生物滞留柱去除雨水径流中污染物试验研究 被引量:1

An Experimental Research on the Removal of Pollutants in Rainwater Runoff by Improved Filler Biological Retention Tanks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统类型生物滞留设施氮、磷去除效果不佳且不稳定的问题,对装填改良材料的传统生物滞留柱性能展开了研究。构建了4个生物滞留柱(Z1、Z2、Z3、Z4),Z1为对照生物滞留柱,其余3个柱子分别装有麦饭石、沸石、蛭石填料层,柱内均设置了35 cm的淹没区,对滞留柱出水进行取样分析。结果表明:4个生物滞留柱对TP、COD、氨氮、硝态氮的去除率分别为76.7%~85.6%、87.78%~94.19%、76.7%~87.67%和78%~88%。与Z1相比,Z2、Z3和Z4对不同污染物的去除效果都有提升,其中Z4(蛭石填料)去除效果最优。 In view of the poor and unstable removal effects of nitrogen and phosphorus by traditional biological retention facilities,a research has thus been carried out on the performance of biological retention columns packed with improved fillers.Four biological retention columns have been constructed,one being a control biological retention column(Z1),and three equipped with different modified packing layers(maifanite,zeolite,vermiculite)biological retention columns,with a 35 cm submerged area set up in the column,followed by a sampling and analysis of the effluent of the retention columns.The results show that the removal rates of TP,COD,NH_(4)^(+)-N,and NO_(3)^(-)-N by the four biological retention columns are 76.7%~85.6%、87.78%~94.19%、76.7%~87.67%and 78%~88%,respectively.Compared with Z1,it is obvious that Z2,Z3 and Z4 are characterized with improved removal effects of different pollutants,among which Z4(vermiculite filler)has the best performance.
作者 付峥嵘 倪尚源 王耀辉 唐宁远 马满英 刘岳林 FU Zhengrong;NI Shangyuan;WANG Yaohui;TANG Ningyuan;MA Manying;LIU Yuelin(College of Civil Engineering,Hunan University of Technology,Zhuzhou Hunan 412007,China;Huasheng Environmental Protection Co.,Ltd.,Zhuzhou Hunan 412007,China)
出处 《湖南工业大学学报》 2022年第1期95-100,共6页 Journal of Hunan University of Technology
基金 湖南省株洲市科技计划基金资助项目(2020-022,2019-022) 株洲市海绵城市低影响开发技术工程研究中心基金资助项目(2018-015)。
关键词 生物滞留柱 填料 反硝化 去除率 biological retention column packing denitrification removal rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献130

  • 1袁东海,高士祥,景丽洁,尹大强,王连生.几种粘土矿物和粘土对溶液中磷的吸附效果[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):60-63. 被引量:48
  • 2卢少勇,金相灿,余刚.人工湿地的氮去除机理[J].生态学报,2006,26(8):2670-2677. 被引量:265
  • 3COLLINS K A, LAWRENCE T J, STADER E K, et al. Opportunities and challenges for managing nitrogen in urban stormwater: A review and synthesis[ J] Ecological Engineering, 2010,36:1507-1519.
  • 4LIU Jia, SAMPLE D J, BELL C, et al. Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban stormwater[ Jl. Water, 2014, 6: 1069-1099.
  • 5DAVIDSON E A, SAVAGE K E, BETTEZ N D, et al. Nitrogen in runoff from residential roads in a coastal area[ J]. Water Air Soil Pollution, 2010,210 : 3-13.
  • 6LI Liqing, DAVIS A P. Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems[ J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48: 3403-3410.
  • 7GAO Cheng, LIU Jun, ZHU Jing, et al. Review of current research on urban low-impact development practices[ J]. Research Jour- nal of Chemistry and Environment, 2013,17:209-214.
  • 8DAVIS A P, STAGGE J H, JAMIL E, et al. Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff[ J]. Water Re- search, 2012,46 : 6775-6786.
  • 9GREBEL J E, MOHANTY S K, TORKELSON A A, et al. Engineered infiltration systems for urban stormwater reclamation [ J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2013,30 ( 8 ) : 437-454.
  • 10SEGARAN R R, LEWIS M, OSTENDORF B. Stormwater quality improvement potential of an urbanised catchment using water sen- sitive retrofits into public parks[ J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2014, 13: 315-324.

共引文献73

同被引文献23

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部