期刊文献+

生物科学专业学生主动合作学习水平现状调查与对策研究 被引量:1

Status quo and countermeasures of active and collaborative learning of bioscience majors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高水平主动合作学习有助于学生获得更大的学业成就.采用中国大学生学习与发展追踪研究(CCSS)调查问卷对G学院生物科学专业学生主动合作学习水平状况进行调查分析.结果表明,生物科学专业学生主动合作学习水平与全国院校之间存在较大的差距;大一至大四各个年级学生主动合作学习水平得分全部低于全国院校常模,但年级得分之间的差异并不显著;主动合作学习水平对教育结果质量具有较大的正向影响,其中以主动学习水平对在校满意度的影响较大,而合作学习水平对自我报告的教育收获的影响较大.因此,改进学生学习方式和教师教学方式、合理提升课程挑战度,进而促进学生主动合作学习,是切实提高生物科学专业人才培养质量的必然途径. High-level active and collaborative learning helps students to achieve greater academic achievement The active and collaborative learning of bioscience majors was investigated and analyzed by using the questionnaire of China College Student Survey.The results show that there is a comparative gap between the overall performance of active and collaborative learning level of bioscience majors and national colleges.The scores of active and collaborative learning of the students of all grades from freshmen to seniors are all lower than the national norm of colleges,but the difference of grade scores is not significant The level of active and collaborative learning has a great positive impact on the quality of educational results,in which the level of active learning has a greater impact on teaching satisfaction,while the level of cooperative learning has a greater impact on the learning obtain of self-report The improvement of learning and teaching methods,and the reasonable enhancement of the degree of curriculum challenge for promote students Active and collaborative learning is an inevitable way to improve the training quality of bioscience majors.
作者 巩红冬 李彪 GONG Hong-dong;LI Biao(Department of Chemistry and Life Science,Gansu Normal College for Nationalities,Hezuo,Gansu 747000,China)
出处 《宁德师范学院学报(自然科学版)》 2021年第4期439-442,448,共5页 Journal of Ningde Normal University(Natural Science)
基金 甘肃省教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度一般课题(GS[2020]GHB4595).
关键词 生物科学专业 主动合作学习水平 教育收获 在校满意度 bioscience majors active and collaborative learning learning obtain teaching satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1潘懋元.《学习风格与大学生自主学习》书评[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2004,24(4):95-96. 被引量:46
  • 2世界银行、联合国教科文组织“高等教育与社会特别工作组”.发展中国家的高等教育:危机与出路[M].蒋凯译.北京:教育科学出版社.2001.6.11.
  • 3UNESCO, Commission II -Quality of Higher Education, Final Report, 2003 ; Michaela Martin, Antony Stella , External Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Making Choices (UNESCO, Paris, 2007), 30.
  • 4Robert K. Toutkoushian, "From the editor - in - chief", In Assessing and Accounting for Student Learning : Beyond the Spellings Commission, New Directions for Institutional Research, edited by Victor M. H. Borden, Gary R. Pike, Assessment Supplement 2007.
  • 5Derek Bok,Our Underachieving Colleges (Princeton University Press, 2006).
  • 6清华大学教育研究院“大学生学习性投入调查”课题组NSSE-China问卷使用手册(2009)[Z].2009.
  • 7L.W.安德森,L.A.索斯尼克.布卢姆教育目标分类-40年的回顾[M].谭晓玉等译.上海:华东大学出版社,1998.
  • 8洛林·W.安德森等.布卢姆教育目标分类学修订版:分类学视角下的学与教及其测评[M].蒋小平等译.北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2009.
  • 9Tinto, V. Leaving College : Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).
  • 10Boyer, Ernest L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990), 1 - 15.

共引文献468

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部