期刊文献+

能谱及灌注CT成像鉴别诊断周围型肺癌和局灶性机化性肺炎的对比研究 被引量:20

A Comparison of Spectral and Perfusion CT Imaging in Differentiating Peripheral Lung Cancer from Focal Organizing Pneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较能谱及灌注CT成像在鉴别周围型肺癌(PLC)和局灶性机化性肺炎(FOP)中的准确度。资料与方法前瞻性收集临床怀疑为肺恶性肿瘤患者,行胸部一站式能谱联合灌注扫描并经病理证实,最终纳入PLC患者45例、FOP患者33例。测量两组病灶在动脉期和静脉期的能谱参数,包括CT_(40 keV)值、CT_(70 keV)值、CT_(100 keV)值、碘(水)浓度(IC)、水(碘)浓度(WC)、有效原子序数(Zeff),并计算能谱曲线斜率(K_(70 keV))。同时测量两组病灶的灌注参数,包括血容量(BV)、血流量(BF)、平均通过时间(MTT)和表面通透性(PS)。比较两组病灶的能谱参数及灌注参数之间的差异。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,比较两组病灶能谱参数及灌注参数的曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度、特异度及准确度。结果在动脉期和静脉期,FOP组的能谱参数CT_(40 keV)、CT_(70 keV)、能谱曲线K_(70 keV)、IC及Zeff大于PLC组,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.21、-2.57、-3.10、-3.06、-3.00,P均<0.05)。FOP组灌注参数BV、BF、MTT及PS低于PLC组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.28、2.56、4.58、2.43,P均<0.05)。双期能谱参数联合的ROC曲线下面积为0.89,大于灌注参数的0.80,其敏感度、特异度和准确度分别为0.86、0.83和0.84。结论与灌注CT成像相比,能谱CT成像鉴别PLC和FOP的准确度更高。 Purpose To compare the accuracy of spectral and perfusion CT imaging in the differential diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer(PLC)and focal organized pneumonia(FOP).Materials and Methods Patients with clinically suspected lung malignant tumors were prospectively collected and underwent one-stop chest spectral and perfusion scan,which was confirmed by pathology.Finally,45 patients with PLC and 33 patients with FOP were collected.The spectral parameters,including CT_(40 keV),CT_(70 keV),CT_(100 keV),iodine(water)concentration(IC),water(iodine)concentration(WC),effective atomic number(Zeff)of the lesions in the arterial and venous phases of the two groups were measured,and the slope of the energy spectrum curve(K_(70 keV))was also calculated.The perfusion parameters,including blood volume(BV),blood flow(BF),mean transit time(MTT)and permeability surface(PS)of the two groups were measured at the same time.The differences of spectral and perfusion parameters between the two groups were compared.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was generated to calculate and compared the area under the curve(AUC),sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of the spectral and perfusion parameters between the two groups.Results In the arterial phase and the venous phase,the spectral parameters CT_(40 keV),CT_(70 keV),spectral curve K_(70 keV),IC and Zeff of the FOP group were significantly greater than those of the PLC group(t=-3.21,-2.57,-3.10,-3.06,-3.00,respectively,all P<0.05).The perfusion parameters BV,BF,MTT and PS of the FOP group were significantly lower than those of the PLC group(t=3.28,2.56,4.58,2.43,respectively,all P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of the combination of spectral parameters was 0.89,which was significantly larger than that of perfusion parameters 0.80,its sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were 0.86,0.83,0.84,respectively.Conclusion Compared with the perfusion CT imaging,spectral CT imaging has a high accuracy in distinguishing PLC from FOP.
作者 邓靓娜 张国晋 林晓强 景梦园 张斌 韩涛 周俊林 DENG Liangna;ZHANG Guojin;LIN Xiaoqiang;JING Mengyuan;ZHANG Bin;HAN Tao;ZHOU Junlin(Department of Radiology,Lanzhou University Second Hospital,the Second Clinical School,Lanzhou University,Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province,Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence,Lanzhou 730030,China;不详)
出处 《中国医学影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第12期1206-1211,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 甘肃省医学影像重点实验室开放基金(GSYX202010)。
关键词 肺肿瘤 原因不明的肺炎组织 体层摄影术 X线计算机 血液灌注 病理学 外科 诊断 鉴别 Lung neoplasms Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia Tomography,X-ray computed Hemoperfusion Pathology,surgical Diagnosis,differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1伍建林,李光军,王克礼,李智勇,刘晓峰.多层螺旋CT灌注成像鉴别诊断肺癌与肺良性肿物[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(4):551-555. 被引量:69
  • 2张金娥,梁长虹,赵振军,林华欢,曾辉,何晖,茹光腾.CT肺灌注在肺结节诊断中的应用研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(10):1041-1045. 被引量:95
  • 3Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors:european organization for research and treatment of cancer,national cancer institute of the United States,national cancer institute of Canada.J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3):205-216.
  • 4Folkman J,Beckner K.Angiogenesis imaging.Acad Radiol,2000,7(10):783-785.
  • 5Lee TY,Purdie TG,Stewart E.CT imaging of angiogenesis.Q J Nucl Med,2003,47 (3):171-187.
  • 6Li Y,Yang ZG,Chen TW,et al.Peripheral lung carcinoma:correlation of angiogenesis and first-pass perfusion parameters of 64-detector row CT.Lung Cancer,2008,61 (1):44-53.
  • 7Kiessling F,Boese J,Corvinus C,et al.Perfusion CT in patients with advanced bronchial carcinomas:a novel chance for characterization and treatment monitoring? Eur Radiol,2004,14(7):1226-1233.
  • 8Seppenwoolde Y,Muller SH,Theuws JCM,et al.Radiation dose-effect relations and local recovery in perfusion for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2000,47 (3):681-690.
  • 9Bellomi M,Petralia G,sonzogni A,et al.CT perfusion for the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in rectal carcinoma:initial experience.Radiology,2007,244 (2):486-493.
  • 10Hermans R,Lambin P,Van den Bogaert W.Tumor perfusion rate determined noninvasively by dynamic computed tomography predicts outcome in head-and-neck cancer after radiotherapy.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2003,57 (5):1351-1356.

共引文献116

同被引文献196

引证文献20

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部