摘要
在指导性行政案例中目的解释方法运用广泛,但法官在运用目的解释方法时尚未形成标准,有关目的性扩张与目的性限缩的论述存在逻辑瑕疵。因此,建议在运用目的解释方法时遵循文义优先的原则,同时引入行政法的比例原则,构建比例原则运用的宽严基准,促进裁判说理更加精细。
Purpose interpretation methods are widely used in guiding administrative cases, but judges have not yet formed a standard when using purpose interpretation methods, and there are logical flaws in the discussion of purpose expansion and purpose restriction. Therefore, it is recommended to follow the principle of literal priority when using the purpose interpretation method, and at the same time introduce the principle of proportionality in administrative law to construct a leniency and strict benchmark for the application of the principle of proportionality, and promote more refined reasoning in the judgment.
作者
缪海伦
MIAO Hai-lun(East China University of Political Science and Law,Changning 200000,China)
出处
《江西电力职业技术学院学报》
CAS
2021年第10期166-168,共3页
Journal of Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Electricity
关键词
目的解释
比例原则
目的性扩张
目的性限缩
Purpose Interpretation
Proportionality Principle
Purpose Expansion
Purpose Restriction