期刊文献+

基于CREAM追溯分析法的地铁司机人因失误研究 被引量:3

Research on Human Error of Subway Drivers Based on CREAM Retrospective Analysis Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 深入探讨地铁司机人因失误事故发生的根原因,对提高地铁司机人因可靠性以及地铁运行安全有着重要意义。首先依据人的行为与意向的关系,将人因失误模式划分为疏忽、遗忘、错误、违规;结合历史地铁人因事故统计、原因分析及专家意见,构建了涵盖与人有关的、与技术有关的、与组织有关的和与环境有关的4个维度的地铁人因失误事故前因分类表;并应用后果—前因之间的归因追溯关系,确定了失误模式—前因表和后果—前因追溯表,提出了一种基于CREAM追溯分析法的地铁司机人因失误分析法。最后进行了实证分析,分析结果与事故调查报告一致。 It is of great significance to improve the human reliability of subway drivers and the safety of subway operation through deeply exploring the root cause of human error accidents of subway drivers.Firstly,according to the relationship between human behavior and intention,the human error mode is divided into oversight,omission,mistake and violation.Combined with the statistics,cause analysis and expert opinions of historical subway human error accidents,the antecedent classification table of subway human error accidents covering four dimensions of human,technology,organization and environment is constructed.By applying the attribution relationship of consequence-antecedent,the table of error mode-antecedent and the retrospective table of consequence-antecedent are determined,and a subway drivers'human error analysis method based on CREAM retrospective analysis method is proposed.Finally,an empirical analysis is carried out,and the analysis results are consistent with the accident investigation report.
作者 张文 杨聚芬 刘志钢 ZHANG Wen;YANG Jufen;LIU Zhigang(Shanghai University of Engineering and Science,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处 《物流科技》 2022年第1期24-27,共4页 Logistics Sci-Tech
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目“基于任务分析与多资源理论的轨道交通行车调度工作负荷与人因绩效研究”(71701124)。
关键词 地铁司机 人因失误 失误模式 CREAM追溯分析法 subway drivers human error error mode CREAM retrospective analysis method
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1王遥,沈祖培.CREAM——第二代人因可靠性分析方法[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(3):17-21. 被引量:43
  • 2张锦,张力.一种人因可靠性分析(HRA)方法[J].安全与环境学报,2003,3(2):62-64. 被引量:15
  • 3沈祖培,王遥,高佳.人因失误的后果-前因追溯表[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):799-802. 被引量:32
  • 4HOLLNAGEL E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method [ M ].Oxford(UK): Elsevier Science Ltd, 1998.
  • 5FUJITA Y, HOLLNAGEL E. Failures without errors: quantification of context in HRA [ J ]. Reliability Engi & Syst Safety, 2004, 83 ( 2 ) :145-151.
  • 6SWAIN A D, GUTYMANN H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications [M]. Washington D. C, 1983.
  • 7Stephen Reinach. Preliminary development of a railroad dispatcher taskload assessment tool: Identification of dispatcher tasks and data collection methods[R]. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 2007.
  • 8Ryan B, Wilson J R, Sharpies S, et al. Developing a rail ergonomics questionnaire (REQUEST)[J]. Applied Ergonom- ics, 2009, 40(2) : 216 -229.
  • 9Read G J, Lenne M G, Moss S A. Associations between task training and social environmental factors and error types involved in rail incidents and accidents[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2012, 48(4):416 -422.
  • 10Jensen F V. An introduction to Bayesian networks[M]. London : UCI, Press, 1996 : 15 - 26.

共引文献60

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部