期刊文献+

“双碳”目标有效路径及误区的理论分析 被引量:25

A Theoretical Analysis on the Effective Path and the Misunderstanding of“Dual Carbon”Goal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于对"碳达峰""碳中和"的理论内涵及现实含义的阐释,本文分析了"双碳"目标的有效路径和现实发展中的认识误区,得出:"双碳"目标的核心要义是持续推进"碳减排"直至实现"碳中和";"双碳"目标的核心政策工具是"碳排放额度";政策成效的评判依据是全生命周期碳减排、碳效率提升、碳减排的"帕累托改进";政策的有效路径是促进各种要素的"有效替代"。基于研究结论,从产业支持政策、低碳消费倒逼机制、碳金融等方面提出了相应的政策主张。 Based on the explanation of the theoretical and practical meaning of“carbon peak”and“carbon neutrality”(referred to as“dual carbon”goal),this paper analyzes the effective path of the“dual carbon”goal and the misunderstandings in the actual development,and draws the following conclusions:(1)the core of the goal is continuous promotion of“carbon reduction”;(2)the key policy tool of the goal is“carbon emission quota”;(3)the basis for policy judgment is:carbon reduction throughout the life cycle and carbon efficiency improvement;(4)the effective path of the policy is“effective replacement”of various elements.Based on the conclusions,the paper puts forward policy propositions from the aspects of industrial support policy,low carbon consumption forcing mechanism and carbon finance.
作者 钟茂初 ZHONG Mao-chu
出处 《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期10-21,共12页 Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目“推动绿色发展促进人与自然和谐共生的政策取向研究”(21AZD058)。
关键词 “双碳”目标 认识误区 有效路径 有效替代 “dual carbon”goal misunderstanding effective path effective replacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1包群,彭水军.经济增长与环境污染:基于面板数据的联立方程估计[J].世界经济,2006,29(11):48-58. 被引量:310
  • 2Rodrigues J, Domingos T, Giljum S. Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2006 ( 3 ) : 256 - 266.
  • 3Eder P, Narodoslawsky M. What environmental pressures are a region's industries responsible for? A method of analysis with descriptive indices and input-output models [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 1999 (3) : 359 - 374.
  • 4Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth [ M]. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1996.35 - 37.
  • 5Munksgaard J, Pedersen K A. CO2 accounts for open economies: producer or consumer responsibility? [ J ]. Energy policy, 2001 (4) : 327 -334.
  • 6Ferng J. Allocating the responsibility of CO2over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2003 (1) : 121 -141.
  • 7Bastianoni S, Pulselli F M, Tiezzi E. The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2004 ( 3 ) : 253 - 257.
  • 8Peters G P, Hertwieh E G. CO2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy [ J ]. Environmental Science & Technology,2008 (5) : 1401 - 1407.
  • 9Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, et al. Shared producer and consumer responsibility theory and practice [ J]. Ecological Economics,2007 (1): 27 -42.
  • 10Wiling H C, Vringer K. Environmental accounting from a producer and a consumer principle: an empirical examination covering the world [ J]. Ecological Economics,2007 (3) : 235 - 255.

共引文献41

同被引文献571

引证文献25

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部