承继共同正犯责任范围之消极说的建构

Construction of negative theory for the responsibility scope of successive joint principal offender

承继共同正犯的责任范围在理论上存在积极说、中间说和消极说的分歧。消极说因契合共同犯罪的本质学说、符合责任主义原则的要求、能够避免产生主观归罪的问题,而在适用的过程中更具有合理性。对于承继共同正犯责任范围的建构应当以法益保护为中心,立足于因果共犯论,根据被侵害法益的数量,分析被侵害法益在后行为加入后是否发生"量"的增加或者"质"的变化,以达到合理地界定承继的共同犯罪中参与人责任范围的目标。

The scope of responsibility of the successive joint principal offender differs in positive, intermediate and negative theories. Negative theory is more reasonable in the process of application because it conforms to the essential theory of joint crime, meets the requirements of the principle of responsibility and can avoid the problem of subjective imputation. Focusing on the protection of legal interests, and based on the theory of causal accomplice and the number of infringed legal interests, we should analyze whether the infringed legal interests have "quantity"increase or "quality" change after the addition of subsequent acts, so as to achieve the goal of reasonably defining the responsibility scope of participants in successive joint crimes.