驾驶人风险感知量表的修订及信效度检验被引量：2

Rivision and Verification of Reliability and Validity of the Risk Perception Scale for Drivers

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的修订并检验中文版风险感知量表的信度和效度。方法选取299名私家车驾驶人,使用中文版风险感知量表对其施测。结果修订后的风险感知量表由8个题目组成,累计方差解释率为70.80%。量表的总内部一致性信度为0.78,各个维度之间的相关系数在0.22~0.37之间。该量表的总分及各维度与亲社会、攻击性驾驶行为,以及驾驶人在过去一年中的交通违规次数、交通事故次数相关显著,表明量表的效度较好。结论修订后的风险感知量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为测量我国私家车驾驶人风险感知的有效工具。 Objective To revise the Risk Perception Scale(RPS)and to assess its reliability and validity among Chinese drivers.Methods 299 private car drivers were tested with the Chinese version of the Risk Perception Scale.Results The revised Risk Perception Scale was composed of eight items,and the explanatory rate of variance was 70.80%.The total internal consistency reliability of the scale was 0.78,and the correlation coefficient between each dimension was between 0.22 and 0.37.The total score and various dimension of the scale were significantly related to prosocial and aggressive driving behaviors,as well as the frequency of traffic violations and traffic accidents in the past year,which indicated that the scale had good validity.Conclusion The revised Risk Perception Scale has good internal consistency and construct validity,and it can be used as an effective tool to assess private car drivers'risk perception in China.

作者任高晓 REN Gao-xiao(School of Psychology,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian,116029,China)

机构地区辽宁师范大学心理学院

出处《人类工效学》 2021年第5期35-38,15,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics

关键词交通安全工程驾驶人事故预防交通心理学风险感知交通事故驾驶行为 traffrc safety engineering driver accident prevention traffic psychology risk perception traffic accident driving behavior

分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1熊坚,吴爱平,秦雅琴,万华森,吉祥,郭凤香.驾驶模拟器培训的有效性实验研究[J].人类工效学,2016,22(1):63-67. 被引量：3
2马文瑶,常若松.亲社会和攻击性驾驶行为量表的修订及信效度检验[J].人类工效学,2016,22(6):7-10. 被引量：12

二级参考文献22

1Allen RW, Rosenthal TJ, Parseghian Z. Low Cost Driv- ing Simulation for Research, Training and Screening Applications [ R ]. SAE Technical Paper, 1995.
2机动车驾驶培训教学与考试大纲[M],中国:中华人民共和国交通运输部、公安部,2012.
3Gruening J, Bernard J, Clover C, et al. Driving Simula- tion[ C]. SAE Special Publications, Vehicle Dynamics and Simulation, 1998.
4Kapp6 B, Van Winsum W, van Wolffelaar P. A Cost - effective Driving Simulator [ C ]. Driving Simulator Conference, Paris, 2002.
5Godley ST, Triggs TJ, Fildes BN. Driving Simulator Validation for Speed Research [ J ]. Accident Analysis & Prevention,2002,34 (5) : 589 - 600.
6Espi6 S, Gauriat P, Duraz M. Driving Simulator Valida- tion:The Issue of Transferability of Results Acquired on Simulator [ C ]. Proceeding of the Driving Simulator Conference, North America, Orlando,2005 : 149 - 156.
7Pierowiez JA, Robin J, Gawron VJ. Re - assessment of Driving Simulators for The Training, Testing and Li- censing of Commercial Vehicle Drivers [ C ]. 2001 In-ternational Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Asp- en,CO (Aug 17 -21,2001) ,2001.
8Roenker DL, Cissell GM, Ball KK, et al. Speed - of - processing and Driving Simulator Training Result in Improved Driving Performance [ J ]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics So- ciety,2003,45(2) :218 -233.
9Ivancic IVK, Hesketh B. Learning from Errors in A Driving Simulation:Effects on Driving Skill and Self- confidence [ J ]. Ergonomics, 2000, 43 ( 12 ) : 1966 - 1984.
10Fisher DL,Laurie NE,Glaser R,et al. Use of A Fixed -base Driving Simulator to Evaluate The Effects of Experience and PC - based Risk Awareness Training on Drivers" Decisions [ J ]. Human Factors : The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2002, 44(2) :287 - 302.