期刊文献+

拥挤效应下双寡头港口定价及政府投资决策

Duopoly Port Pricing and Government Investment Decision under Congestion Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对目前港口等交通领域发生的拥挤现象,首先基于Hotelling模型给定发货人选择港口的效用,其次通过Nash均衡求解,分析双寡头港口的定价及政府投资决策。研究发现:拥挤程度较大时,港口企业的定价和利润会下降。如果港口所在城市道路较为畅通,改善港口的服务水平,会有利于该港口企业利润的提升;如果港口所在城市道路较为拥挤,则港口单方面做出改善服务水平的决策不一定会提升港口企业的利润。此外,当道路本身拥挤严重时,政府增加投资会起到改善通行环境,使港口企业利润最大化的作用;当道路通行状况良好时,政府追加投资会引发双方企业为争夺客户资源而展开的低价竞争,导致港口企业整体利润下降。 In view of the congestion phenomenon in ports and other transportation fields,the pricing and government investment decisions of duopoly ports are analyzed based on Hotelling model and Nash equilibrium solution.It is found that the pricing and profit of port enterprises will decrease when the degree of congestion is large.If the city where the port is located has smooth roads,improving the service level of the port will be conducive to the improvement of the profit of the port enterprises;if the port is located in a congested city,the port's unilateral decision to improve the service level may not improve the profits of port enterprises.In addition,when the road itself is seriously crowded,the government will increase investment to improve the traffic environment,so as to maximize the profit of port enterprises;however,when the road is in good condition,the government's additional investment will trigger the low-cost competition between enterprises of both sides for customer resources,resulting in the decline of the overall profit of port enterprises.
作者 王爽 田小勇 陈祖光 WANG Shuang;TIAN Xiao-yong;CHEN Zu-guang(School of Economics and Management,Hunan Institute of Science and Technology,Yueyang 414000;School of Economics and Management,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610000,China)
出处 《物流工程与管理》 2021年第12期95-100,共6页 Logistics Engineering and Management
基金 湖南省自然科学基金(2018JJ2157) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(19YJA630069) 湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(18YBA217)。
关键词 政府投资 拥挤效应 NASH均衡 服务水平 government investment congestion effect nash equilibrium service level
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1刘庆顺.差别定价策略在港口企业中的运用[J].中国港口,2003(7):39-39. 被引量:2
  • 2方晓平,陈治亚,黄由衡.差别定价法在铁路运输中的应用研究[J].长沙铁道学院学报,2000,18(4):39-43. 被引量:17
  • 3吉阿兵,朱道立.网络外部性下的港口竞争策略设计[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(7):105-111. 被引量:16
  • 4朱道立,吉阿兵.港口价格竞争策略研究[J].复旦学报(自然科学版),2006,45(5):555-560. 被引量:11
  • 5Javier Rodero, Pablo Branas. Hotelling and the Olympus:Modeling differences in religious prices [ J]. CEJOR. 2000,8 (4) : 265 -283.
  • 6Takatoshi Tabuchi. Pricing policy in spatial competition [ J ]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1999,29 (5) : 617 - 631.
  • 7施欣.港口服务产品差异化策略竞争博弈对策分析[A].中国航海学会学术论文集[C].北京:中国航海学会,2001.169-173.
  • 8Ralph M. Braid. Spatial price discrimination and the locations of firms with different product selections or product varieties [ J ]. Economics Letters ,2008,98 ( 3 ) :342 - 347.
  • 9Holelling lt. Stability in competition [ J ]. Economic Journal, 1929,39(153) :41 -57.
  • 10Toshihiro Matsumura, Makoto Okamura. Equilibrium number of firms and economic welfare in a spatial price discrimination model [ J ]. Economics Letters, 2006,90 ( 3 ) : 396 - 401.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部