期刊文献+

《中华人民共和国民法典》颁行后民行交叉案件一并审理的三个面向

The three aspects of the simultaneous trial of civil-and-administrative crossed cases after the promulgation of The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 民行交叉案件一并审理虽有《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第61条的原则性规定,但一并审理的内涵界定以及如何一并审理仍然是理论研究和司法实践中的难点。作为调整民事法律关系基本性法律的《中华人民共和国民法典》颁行后,民行交叉案件在行政诉讼中如何一并审理成为理论和实务需要面对的问题。未来一并审理民行交叉案件应注重以下三个面向:一是面向诉源治理,为减少诉累和实质性化解纷争坚持能审尽审;二是面向精准适用法律,从诉求和保护法益上运用规范主义框定基础诉讼;三是面向纠纷实质性化解,结合审慎审查方法运用功能主义定纷止争。上述三个面向在一定程度上为解决审判实践中存在的先行后民、先民后行和民行同步审理等困扰提供了较为可行的路径。 Although the trial of civil-and-administrative crossed cases has the principle provisions of Article 61 of The Administrative Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China,the definition of the connotation and how to conduct the simultaneous trial are still the difficult points in theoretical research and judicial practice.After the promulgation of The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China,which is the basic law to adjust the civil legal relationship,there are new opportunities and challenges for the simultaneous trial of civil-and-administrative crossed cases in administrative litigation.In the future,we should pay attention to the following three aspects:first,we should focus on the governance of the source of litigation,and insist on the full trial in order to reduce litigation fatigue and substantively resolve disputes;second,we should apply the law in a precise manner to form the basic litigation in terms of the appearance and the interests of the protection law with normative principles;and the third is to face the substantive settlement of disputes,combined with the prudent reviews method to settle disputes with functionalism.To a certain extent,the above three aspects provide a relatively feasible way to solve the problems existing in the trial practice,such as trial of civil before administrative cases,trial of administrative before civil cases and the simultaneous trial of both.
作者 李会勋 王筠涵 LI Hui-xun;WANG Jun-han(School of Arts and Law,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,China)
出处 《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第4期70-75,共6页 Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(20YJC820022) 中国博士后基金面上项目(2017M612238) 山东省社会科学规划研究专项(20CFZJ30)。
关键词 民行交叉案件 实质性解决争议 规范主义 功能主义 civil-and-administrative crossed cases the substantive settlement of disputes normativism functionalism
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献116

共引文献287

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部