普通电切镜和等离子电切镜在前列腺增生手术治疗中的应用效果

The application effect of conventional resectoscope and plasma resectoscope in the operation of prostatic hyperplasia

目的分析普通电切镜和等离子电切镜在前列腺增生手术治疗中的应用效果。方法80例进行手术治疗的前列腺增生患者,采用随机数字表法分为对照组及观察组,每组40例。对照组实施普通电切镜治疗,观察组实施等离子电切镜治疗。对比两组患者的术中出血量、导尿管留置时间、住院时间以及并发症发生率。结果观察组患者的术中出血量(184.63±15.34)ml少于对照组的(249.74±18.47)ml,导尿管留置时间(4.76±1.37)d、住院时间(7.84±1.85)d短于对照组的(6.84±1.76)、(11.48±2.31)d,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的术后并发症发生率为0,低于对照组的10.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论为前列腺增生患者实施等离子电切镜手术治疗,可有效降低患者术中出血量、缩短导尿管留置时间,减少并发症发生率,更快促进患者身体恢复,值得大力推广。

Objective To analyze the application effect of conventional resectoscope and plasma resectoscope in the operation of prostatic hyperplasia.Methods A total of 80 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia undergoing surgical treatment were divided into control group and observation group by random numerical table,with 40 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conventional resectoscope,and the observation group was treated with plasma resectoscope.The intraoperative blood loss,catheter indwelling time,hospitalization time and the complication rates were compared between the two groups.Results The intraoperative blood loss(184.63±15.34)ml of the observation group was less than(249.74±18.47)ml of the control group,and the catheter indwelling time(4.76±1.37)d and hospitalization time(7.84±1.85)d were shorter than(6.84±1.76)and(11.48±2.31)d of the control group.All the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The postoperative complication rates in the observation group was 0,which was lower than 10.00%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Plasma resectoscope for patients with prostatic hyperplasia can effectively reduce the of intraoperative blood loss,catheter indwelling time,reduce the complication rates,and promote the recovery of patients,which is worthy of promotion.