期刊文献+

经皮肝射频消融术联合经导管肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期结直肠癌多发肝转移瘤患者的效果

Effects of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of live combined with transcatheter hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer with multiple liver metastases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察经皮肝射频消融术联合经导管肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期结直肠癌(CRC)多发肝转移瘤患者的效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年1月该院收治的71例晚期CRC多发肝转移瘤患者作为研究对象,按治疗方法不同将其分为观察组36例与对照组35例。对照组采用经导管肝动脉灌注化疗治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合经皮肝射频消融术治疗,比较两组客观缓解率、治疗前后肿瘤标志物指标[癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)]水平、肝功能指标[丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)与天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)]水平、无进展生存时间(PFS)和不良反应发生率。结果:观察组客观缓解率为58.33%,高于对照组的34.29%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,观察组CEA和CA19-9水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组ALT和AST水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组PFS长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组恶心、腹泻、骨髓抑制神经毒性、手足综合征发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:经皮肝射频消融术联合经导管肝动脉灌注化疗治疗晚期CRC多发肝转移瘤患者可提高客观缓解率,降低肿瘤标志物指标水平和肝功能指标水平,以及延长PFS,其效果优于单纯经导管肝动脉灌注化疗。 Objective:To observe effects of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of live combined with transcatheter hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer(CRC)with multiple liver metastases.Methods:71 patients with advanced CRC with multiple liver metastases admitted to the hospital from January 2017 to January 2018 were selected as the subjects and retrospectively analyzed.According to different treatment methods,they were divided into observation group(36 cases)and control group(35 cases).The control group was treated with transcatheter hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy,while the observation group was treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation on the basis of that of the control group.The objective remission rate,the levels of tumor markers[carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9)],the levels of liver function indexes[alanine aminotransferase(ALT)and aspartate aminotransferase(AST)],the progression-free survival time(PFS)and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after the treatment.Results:The objective response rate in the observation group was 58.33%,which was higher than 34.29%in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After the treatment,the levels of CEA and CA19-9 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The levels of ALT and AST in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The PFS of the observation group was longer than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).However,there were no significant differences in the incidences of nausea,diarrhea,myelosuppressive neurotoxicity,and hand-foot syndrome between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver combined with transcatheter hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of the patients with advanced CRC with multiple liver metastases can improve the objective remission rate,reduce the levels of tumor markers and liver function indicators,and prolong PFS.Moreover,it is superior to single transcatheter hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy.
作者 王强 WANG Qiang(Department of Intervention of Lankao County Central Hospital,Lankao 475300 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2021年第23期19-22,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 肝动脉灌注 经皮肝射频消融术 晚期结直肠癌 多发肝转移瘤 肿瘤标志物 肝功能 Hepatic artery infusion Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver Advanced colorectal cancer Multiple liver metastases Tumor marker Liver function
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

  • 1Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, et al. Towards a pan - Europe- an consensus on the treatment of patients with eolorectal liver metastases [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2006,42(14) :2212 - 2221.
  • 2Yoo PS, Lopez - Soler RI, Longo WE, et al. Liver resection for meta- static colorectal cancer in the age of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bev- acizumab[ J]. Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2006,6 (3) :202 - 207.
  • 3Martin RC, Robbins K, Tomalty D, et al. Transarterial chemoembolisa- tion (TACE) using irinotecan - loaded beads for the treatment of unre- sectable metastases to the liver in patients with coloreetal cancer: an in- terim report[ J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2009,7:80.
  • 4Brown DB, Gould JE, Gervais DA, et 81. Transeatheter therapy for he- patic malignancy: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria [ J ]. J Vase Interv Radiol, 2007,18 ( 12 ) : 1469 - 1478.
  • 5Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to eval- uate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the U- nited States, National Cancer Institute of Canada [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000,92(3) :205 -216.
  • 6Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, et al. Clinical management of hepato- cellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona- 2000 EASL confer- ence. European Association for the Study of the Liver [ J ]. J Hepatol, 2001,35 (3) :421 - 430.
  • 7Llovet JM, Di BAM, Bruix J, et al. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008, 100 (10) :698 -711.
  • 8Eisanhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et el. New response evaluation criteria in solid turnouts : revised RECIST guideline ( version 1.1 ) [ J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45(2) :228 -247.
  • 9Fomer A, Ayuso C, Varela M, et al. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evalua- tion criteria in solid tumors reliable[ J]. Cancer, 2009,115 ( 3 ) :616 - 623.
  • 10Miller FH, Keppke AL, Reddy D, et al. Response of liver metastases after treatment with yttrium - 90 micmspheres : role of size, necrosis, and PET[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2007,188(3) :776 -783.

共引文献274

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部