社区治理绩效损失:生成机理与矫正策略研究

Performance Loss of Community Governance: Research on Generation Mechanism and Correction Mechanism

城市社区基层自治的制度设计是我国基层民主治理的一个重要实践。城市社区治理机制的研究对于国家治理体系和治理能力现代化研究具有重要的意义。城市社区自治是一个多元协同治理的典型。不同治理主体之间的合作治理水平和能力将决定着社区治理的整体绩效。文章深入解构XZ市某社区的治理功能失调的案例,提出了社区治理绩效损失的理论模型,基于绩效损失的理论视角,文章分析了不同的治理主体在该社区治理过程中所表现出的行为、过程和结果,并分析了社区治理主体行为与绩效损失的内在联系,讨论了城市社区基层治理功能衰减、弱化的内在诱因。借助该社区治理绩效损失的生产和选择过程,帮助人们在绩效损失的视角下全面理解我国新建社区在自治的治理机制实施过程中的问题。在分析社区治理绩效损失生成机理的基础上,提出有效规避基层社区治理绩效损失的对策建议,为城市社区治理体系和治理能力的提升提供新的"抓手"。

The system design of grassroots self-governance in urban communities is an important practice of grassroots democratic governance in China. The research on the urban community governance is of great significance to the research on the modernization of national governance system and governance capabilities. The governance of urban community is a typical example of multiple coordinated governance. The level and ability of cooperative governance between different governance entities wil determine the overal performance of community governance. The article conducts an in-depth deconstruction of the governance dysfunction in a community in the City of XZ. The article proposes a theoretical model of community governance performance loss. Based on the theoretical perspective of performance loss, the article analyzes the behavior of different governance entities in the community governance process and results. It also analyzes the internal relationship between the behavior of community governance entities and performance loss, and discusses the internal incentives for the decline and weakening of the grassroots governance function of urban communities. With the help of the production and selection process of community governance performance loss, it helps people to fuly understand the problems in the implementation of autonomous governance mechanisms in China’s new communities from the perspective of performance loss. Based on the analysis of the generation mechanism of community governance performance loss, the author has put forward countermeasures and suggestions to effectively avoid the loss of grassroots community governance performance so as to provide a new approach to improving the urban community governance system and governance capabilities.